Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35426950›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2022

Quantifying predator functional responses under field conditions reveals interactive effects of temperature and interference with sex and stage.

Kyle E Coblentz, Amber Squires, Stella Uiterwaal, John P Delong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyle E CoblentzSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0069-8491
Amber SquiresSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Stella UiterwaalSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2745-5817
John P DelongSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0558-8213

Funding

James S. McDonnell Foundation Scholar Award in Studying Complex SystemsNational Science Foundation DGE-1610400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predator functional responses describe predator feeding rates and are central to predator-prey theory. Originally defined as the relationship between predator feeding rates and prey densities, it is now well known that functional responses are shaped by a multitude of factors. However, much of our knowledge about how these factors influence functional responses is based on laboratory studies that are generally logistically constrained to examining only a few factors simultaneously and that have unclear links to the conditions organisms experience in the field. We apply an observational approach for measuring functional responses to understand how sex/stage differences, temperature and predator densities interact to influence the functional response of zebra jumping spiders on midges under natural conditions. We used field surveys of jumping spiders to infer their feeding rates and examine the relationships between feeding rates, sex/stage, midge density, predator density and temperature using generalized additive models. We then used the relationships supported by the models to fit parametric functional responses to the data. We find that feeding rates of zebra jumping spiders follow some expectations from previous laboratory studies such as increasing feeding rates with body size and decreasing feeding rates with predator densities. However, in contrast to previous results, our results also show a lack of temperature response in spider feeding rates and differential decreases in the feeding rates of females and juveniles with densities of different spider sexes/stages. Our results illustrate the multidimensional nature of functional responses in natural settings and reveal how factors influencing functional responses can interact with one another through behaviour and morphology. Further studies investigating the influence of multiple mechanisms on predator functional responses under field conditions will increase our understanding of the drivers of predator-prey interaction strengths and their consequences for communities and ecosystems.

Indexed as

Predatory BehaviorSpidersAnimalsBody SizeEcosystemFemaleFood ChainTemperaturefeeding ratesforagingintraspecific variationjumping spiderspredator-prey interactionssexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID35426950
PMCPMC9540483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.