Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35426591›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2022

SAMPL7 protein-ligand challenge: A community-wide evaluation of computational methods against fragment screening and pose-prediction.

Harold Grosjean, Mehtap Işık, Anthony Aimon, David Mobley, John Chodera, Frank von Delft, Philip C Biggin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Need for Continuing Blinded Pose- and Activity Prediction Benchmarks.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Review
  10. Thermal Titration Molecular Dynamics: The Revenge of the Fragments.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  11. Fighting Antimicrobial Resistance: Insights on How theJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. ChemFlow─From 2D Chemical Libraries to Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energies.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Harold GrosjeanStructural Bioinformatics and Computational Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, South Parks Road, OX1 3QU, Oxford, UK.
Mehtap IşıkComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 10065, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6789-952X
Anthony AimonDiamond Light Source Ltd, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, OX11 0QX, Didcot, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9135-129X
David MobleyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Chemistry, University of California, 92617, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1083-5533
John ChoderaComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 10065, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0542-119X
Frank von DelftDiamond Light Source Ltd, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, OX11 0QX, Didcot, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0378-0017
Philip C BigginStructural Bioinformatics and Computational Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, South Parks Road, OX1 3QU, Oxford, UK. Philip.biggin@bioch.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5100-8836
Diamond Light Source · GBMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USPhilips (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
The role of reorganization energy in achieving selective kinase inhibition"R01GM121505 · NIGMS · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CHODERA, JOHN DAMON · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
Advancing predictive physical modeling through focused development of model systems to drive new modeling innovationsR01GM124270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MOBLEY, DAVID LOWELL · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121505NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124270NIH HHS P30CA008748NIH HHS R01GM121505NIH HHS R01GM124270Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel crystallographic fragment screening data set was generated and used in the SAMPL7 challenge for protein-ligands. The SAMPL challenges prospectively assess the predictive power of methods involved in computer-aided drug design. Application of various methods to fragment molecules are now widely used in the search for new drugs. However, there is little in the way of systematic validation specifically for fragment-based approaches. We have performed a large crystallographic high-throughput fragment screen against the therapeutically relevant second bromodomain of the Pleckstrin-homology domain interacting protein (PHIP2) that revealed 52 different fragments bound across 4 distinct sites, 47 of which were bound to the pharmacologically relevant acetylated lysine (Kac) binding site. These data were used to assess computational screening, binding pose prediction and follow-up enumeration. All submissions performed randomly for screening. Pose prediction success rates (defined as less than 2 Å root mean squared deviation against heavy atom crystal positions) ranged between 0 and 25% and only a very few follow-up compounds were deemed viable candidates from a medicinal-chemistry perspective based on a common molecular descriptors analysis. The tight deadlines imposed during the challenge led to a small number of submissions suggesting that the accuracy of rapidly responsive workflows remains limited. In addition, the application of these methods to reproduce crystallographic fragment data still appears to be very challenging. The results show that there is room for improvement in the development of computational tools particularly when applied to fragment-based drug design.

Indexed as

Drug DesignProteinsBinding SitesLigandsProtein BindingLigandsProteinsBromodomainCrystallographyFragment-based drug designHigh-throughput screeningPleckstrin-homology domain interacting proteinSAMPL challenge

Identifiers

PMID35426591
PMCPMC9010448
OpenAlexW4223897499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.