Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35426579›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hematology2022

Antibody response to COVID-19 vaccine in 130 recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Takafumi Tsushima, Toshiki Terao, Kentaro Narita, Ami Fukumoto, Daisuke Ikeda, Yuya Kamura, Ayumi Kuzume, Rikako Tabata, Daisuke Miura, Masami Takeuchi and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. COVID-19 and HSCT (Hematopoietic stem cell transplant).Best practice & research. Clinical haematology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takafumi TsushimaDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Toshiki TeraoDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Kentaro NaritaDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Ami FukumotoDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Daisuke IkedaDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Yuya KamuraDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Ayumi KuzumeDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Rikako TabataDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Daisuke MiuraDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Masami TakeuchiDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Kosei MatsueDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan. koseimatsue@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8669-9865
Kameda Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated anti-spike protein antibody (anti-S) production in 130 hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients who received the coronavirus disease-2019 vaccine. Sixty-five received allo-HSCT and 65 received auto-HSCT. Disease-specific treatments were being administered to 43.1% of allo-HSCT and 69.2% of auto-HSCT patients. Seropositivity was observed in 87.7% of allo-HSCT and 89.2% in auto-HSCT patients. Anti-S antibody production was significantly impaired in auto-HSCT patients compared with controls (178U/mL [0.4-4990.0] vs. 669 U/mL [40.3-4377.0], p < 0.001), but not in allo-HSCT patients (900 U/mL [0.4-12,893.0] vs. 860 U/mL [40.3-8988.0], P = 0.659). Clinically relevant anti-S antibody levels (> 264 U/mL) were achieved in 59.2% of patients (76.9% in allo-HSCT and 41.5% in auto-HSCT). The main factors influencing the protective level of the antibody response were the CD19 + cell count and serum immunoglobulin G levels, and these were significant in both allo-HSCT and auto-HSCT patients. Other factors included time since HSCT, complete remission status, use of immunosuppressive drugs, and levels of lymphocyte subsets including CD4, CD8 and CD56 positive cells, but these were only significant in allo-HSCT patients. Allo-HSCT patients had a relatively favorable antibody response, while auto-HSCT patients had poorer results.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAntibody FormationCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, AutologousTransplantation, HomologousCOVID-19 VaccinesAllogeneic HSCTAntibodyAutologous HSCTCOVID-19 vaccine

Identifiers

PMID35426579
PMCPMC9011370
OpenAlexW4223934480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.