Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35426570›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2022

A comparative biodistribution study of polymeric and lipid-based nanoparticles.

Andreas K O Åslund, Rob J Vandebriel, Fanny Caputo, Wim H de Jong, Christiaan Delmaar, Astrid Hyldbakk, Emilie Rustique, Ruth Schmid, Sofie Snipstad, Isabelle Texier and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Rapid Fc-mediated surface modification of liposomes with antibodies for selective targeting of pancreatic tumors.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Biomaterials science · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. REFINE special issue.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Andreas K O ÅslundDept. Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, SINTEF Industry, Trondheim, Norway.
Rob J VandebrielNational Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Fanny CaputoUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CEA LETI MINATEC Campus, Grenoble, France.
Wim H de JongNational Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Christiaan DelmaarNational Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Astrid HyldbakkDept. Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, SINTEF Industry, Trondheim, Norway.
Emilie RustiqueUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CEA LETI MINATEC Campus, Grenoble, France.
Ruth SchmidDept. Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, SINTEF Industry, Trondheim, Norway.
Sofie SnipstadDept. Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, SINTEF Industry, Trondheim, Norway.
Isabelle TexierUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CEA LETI MINATEC Campus, Grenoble, France.
Kai VernstadDept. Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, SINTEF Industry, Trondheim, Norway.
Sven Even F BorgosDept. Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, SINTEF Industry, Trondheim, Norway. sveneven.borgos@sintef.no.ORCID 0000-0002-6222-9252
SINTEF · NOInstitut polytechnique de Grenoble · FRNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodistribution of nanoencapsulated bioactive compounds is primarily determined by the size, shape, chemical composition and surface properties of the encapsulating nanoparticle, and, thus, less dependent on the physicochemical properties of the active pharmaceutical ingredient encapsulated. In the current work, we aimed to investigate the impact of formulation type on biodistribution profile for two clinically relevant nanoformulations. We performed a comparative study of biodistribution in healthy rats at several dose levels and durations up to 14-day post-injection. The studied nanoformulations were nanostructured lipid carriers incorporating the fluorescent dye IR780-oleyl, and polymeric nanoparticles containing the anticancer agent cabazitaxel. The biodistribution was approximated by quantification of the cargo in blood and relevant organs. Several clear and systematic differences in biodistribution were observed, with the most pronounced being a much higher (more than 50-fold) measured concentration ratio between cabazitaxel in all organs vs. blood, as compared to IR780-oleyl. Normalized dose linearity largely showed opposite trends between the two compounds after injection. Cabazitaxel showed a higher brain accumulation than IR780-oleyl with increasing dose injected. Interestingly, cabazitaxel showed a notable and prolonged accumulation in lung tissue compared to other organs. The latter observations could warrant further studies towards a possible therapeutic indication within lung and conceivably brain cancer for nanoformulations of this highly antineoplastic compound, for which off-target toxicity is currently dose-limiting in the clinic.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNanoparticlesNanostructuresAnimalsDrug CarriersLipidsPolymersRatsTissue DistributionAntineoplastic AgentsDrug CarriersLipidsPolymersADMEBiodistributionNanobiomaterialNanomedicineNanostructured lipid carrierPoly(alkyl cyanoacrylate)

Identifiers

PMID35426570
PMCPMC9012159
OpenAlexW4223893705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.