ArticleMolecular biology reports2022
Expression analysis of vitamin D receptor and its related long non-coding RNAs in peripheral blood of patients with Parkinson's disease.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParkinson's disease (PD) is a neurological condition that is associated with abnormal expression of several transcripts. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a possible participant in the pathogenesis of PD. METHODS AND
resultsIn the present research project, we evaluated expressions of VDR and three functionally associated long non-coding RNAs with this signaling, namely SNHG6, SNHG16 and LINC00346 in PD patients versus normal controls. Level of SNHG6 transcripts was lower in total patients in comparison with total controls (Expression ratio (95% CI) 0.44 (0.17-1.08)) and in male patients compared with male controls (Expression ratio (95% CI) 0.29 (0.13-0.65)). On the other hand, expression of VDR was higher in total patients compared with total controls (Expression ratio (95% CI) 10.86 (4.37-26.72)) and in male patients compared with male controls (Expression ratio (95% CI) 22.16 (6.23-78.8)). There was no significant difference in expression of SNHG16 and LINC00346 between PD patients and controls. Amounts of SNHG6 and VDR transcripts could differentiate total PD patients from total controls with AUC values of 0.66 and 0.86, respectively.
conclusionsCumulatively, the results of the present investigation imply dysregulation of VDR signaling in PD and necessitate conduction of further functional studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.