Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35426528›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2024

Scoping review on trauma and recovery in youth after natural disasters: what Europe can learn from natural disasters around the world.

Andreas Witt, Cedric Sachser, Jörg M Fegert

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sex and Gender Influences on the Impacts of Disasters: A Rapid Review of Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Times marked by consecutive crises.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas WittDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, Steinhövelstraße 1, 89073, Ulm, Germany. Andreas.witt@uniklinik-ulm.de.
Cedric SachserDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, Steinhövelstraße 1, 89073, Ulm, Germany.
Jörg M FegertDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, Steinhövelstraße 1, 89073, Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, Europe has seen a rise in natural disasters. Due to climate change, an increase of such events is predicted for the future. While natural disasters have been a rare phenomenon in Europe so far, other regions of the world, such as Central and North America or Southeast Asia, have regularly been affected by Hurricanes and Tsunamis. The aim of the current study is to synthesize the literature on child development in immediate stress, prolonged reactions, trauma, and recovery after natural disasters with a special focus on trajectories of (mal-)adaptation. In a literature search using PubMed, Psychinfo and EBSCOhost, 15 studies reporting about 11 independent samples, including 11,519 participants aged 3-18 years, were identified. All studies identified resilience, recovery, and chronic trajectories. There was also evidence for delayed or relapsing trajectories. The proportions of participants within each trajectory varied across studies, but the more favorable trajectories such as resilient or recovering trajectory were the most prevalent. The results suggested a more dynamic development within the first 12 months post-disaster. Female gender, a higher trauma exposure, more life events, less social support, and negative coping emerged as risk factors. Based on the results, a stepped care approach seems useful for the treatment of victims of natural disasters. This may support victims in their recovery and strengthen their resilience. As mental health responses to disasters vary, a coordinated screening process is necessary, to plan interventions and to detect delayed or chronic trauma responses and initiate effective interventions.

Indexed as

DisastersNatural DisastersResilience, PsychologicalStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolEuropeFemaleHumansMaleChildrenNatural disastersRecoveryResilienceStepped careTrajectoriesTrauma

Identifiers

PMID35426528
PMCPMC10894166
OpenAlexW4223982285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.