ArticleDysphagia2022
Impact of Limb Phenotype on Tongue Denervation Atrophy, Dysphagia Penetrance, and Survival Time in a Mouse Model of ALS.
Article in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tongue blade neuromuscular junction defects in old F344 rats.Respiratory physiology & neurobiology · 2026Article
- Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) Swallowing Physiology: Novel Dysphagia Model Across Lifespan.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
- Research advances in dysphagia animal models.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Timeline of hypoglossal motor neuron death and intrinsic tongue muscle denervation in high-copy number SOD1Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Minimally Invasive Murine Laryngoscopy for Close-Up Imaging of Laryngeal Motion during Breathing and Swallowing.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023Article
- Radiation induced changes in profibrotic markers in the submental muscles and their correlation with tongue movement.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Current treatments for dysphagia in ALS do not target the underlying tongue weakness and denervation atrophy that is prevalent in spinal and bulbar ALS cases. To address this clinical gap, we studied the low copy number SOD1-G93A (LCN-SOD1) mouse model of ALS to quantify the impact of limb phenotype on tongue denervation atrophy, dysphagia penetrance, and survival time in preparation for future treatment-based studies. Two male LCN-SOD1 breeders and 125 offspring were followed for limb phenotype inheritance, of which 52 (30 LCN-SOD1 and 22 wild-type/WT, both sexes) underwent characterization of dysphagia penetrance (via videofluoroscopic swallow study; VFSS) and survival time at disease end-stage (15-20% body weight loss). From these, 16 mice (8/genotype) underwent postmortem histological analysis of the genioglossus for evidence of denervation atrophy. Results revealed that both breeders displayed a mixed (hindlimb and forelimb) ALS phenotype and sired equal proportions of hindlimb vs. mixed phenotype offspring. Dysphagia penetrance was complete for mixed (100%) versus incomplete for hindlimb (64%) phenotype mice; yet survival times were similar. Regardless of limb phenotype, LCN-SOD1 mice had significantly smaller genioglossus myofibers and more centralized myonuclei compared to WT mice (p < 0.05). These biomarkers of denervation atrophy were significantly correlated with VFSS metrics (lick and swallow rates, p < 0.05) but not survival time. In conclusion, both LCN-SOD1 phenotypes had significant tongue denervation atrophy, even hindlimb phenotype mice without dysphagia. This finding recapitulates human ALS, providing robust rationale for using this preclinical model to explore targeted treatments for tongue denervation atrophy and ensuing dysphagia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.