ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022
Optimization of through-time radial GRAPPA with coil compression and weight sharing.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- New clinical opportunities of low-field MRI: heart, lung, body, and musculoskeletal.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Optimization of through-time radial GRAPPA with coil compression and weight sharing.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis work proposes principal component analysis (PCA) coil compression and weight sharing to reduce acquisition and reconstruction time of through-time radial GRAPPA.
methodsThrough-time radial GRAPPA enables ungated free-breathing motion-resolved cardiac imaging but requires a long calibration acquisition and GRAPPA weight calculation time. PCA coil compression reduces calibration data requirements and associated acquisition time, and weight sharing reduces the number of unique GRAPPA weight sets and associated weight computation time. In vivo cardiac data reconstructed with coil compression and weight sharing are compared to a gold standard to demonstrate improvement in calibration acquisition and reconstruction performance with minimal loss of image quality.
resultsCoil compression from 30 physical to 12 virtual coils (90% of signal variance) decreases requisite calibration data by 60%, reducing calibration acquisition time to 6.7 s/slice from 31.5 s/slice reported in original through-time radial GRAPPA work. Resulting images have small increase in RMS error (RMSE). Reconstruction with a weight sharing factor of 8 results in eight-fold reduction in GRAPPA weight calculation time with a comparable RMSE to reconstructions with no weight sharing. Optimized parameters for coil compression and weight sharing applied to reconstructions enables images to be collected with a temporal resolution of 66 ms/frame and spatial resolution of 2.34 × 2.34 mm while reducing calibration acquisition time from 34 to 6.7 s, weight calculation time from 200 to 3 s, and weight application time 18 to 5 s.
conclusionCoil compression and weight sharing applied to through-time radial GRAPPA enables fast free-breathing ungated cardiac cine without compromising image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.