Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35426200›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2022

Can restoration of fire-dependent ecosystems reduce ticks and tick-borne disease prevalence in the eastern United States?

Michael R Gallagher, Jesse K Kreye, Erika T Machtinger, Alexis Everland, Nathaniel Schmidt, Nicholas S Skowronski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Pathogens and planetary change.Nature reviews. Biodiversity · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Can restoration of fire-dependent ecosystems reduce ticks and tick-borne disease prevalence in the eastern United States?Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael R GallagherUSDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, New Lisbon, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0175-558X
Jesse K KreyeDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7736-9688
Erika T MachtingerDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6492-0901
Alexis EverlandNew Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Forest Fire Service, New Lisbon, New Jersey, USA.
Nathaniel SchmidtDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Nicholas S SkowronskiUSDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5801-5614
Pennsylvania State University · USNorthern Research Station · USNew Jersey Department of Environmental Protection · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past century, fire suppression has facilitated broad ecological changes in the composition, structure, and function of fire-dependent landscapes throughout the eastern US, which are in decline. These changes have likely contributed mechanistically to the enhancement of habitat conditions that favor pathogen-carrying tick species, key wildlife hosts of ticks, and interactions that have fostered pathogen transmission among them and to humans. While the long-running paradigm for limiting human exposure to tick-borne diseases focuses responsibility on individual prevention, the continued expansion of medically important tick populations, increased incidence of tick-borne disease in humans, and emergence of novel tick-borne diseases highlights the need for additional approaches to stem this public health challenge. Another approach that has the potential to be a cost-effective and widely applied but that remains largely overlooked is the use of prescribed fire to ecologically restore degraded landscapes that favor ticks and pathogen transmission. We examine the ecological role of fire and its effects on ticks within the eastern United States, especially examining the life cycles of forest-dwelling ticks, shifts in regional-scale fire use over the past century, and the concept that frequent fire may have helped moderate tick populations and pathogen transmission prior to the so-called fire-suppression era that has characterized the past century. We explore mechanisms of how fire and ecological restoration can reduce ticks, the potential for incorporating the mechanisms into the broader strategy for managing ticks, and the challenges, limitations, and research needs of prescribed burning for tick reduction.

Indexed as

FiresTick-Borne DiseasesTicksAnimalsEcosystemHumansPrevalenceUnited Statesdisturbancesforest structuremesophicationmicroclimateprescribed fireticks

Identifiers

PMID35426200
PMCPMC13425693
OpenAlexW4224026457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.