Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35426158›Full record

ArticleMuscle & nerve2022

Delivering multidisciplinary neuromuscular care for children via telehealth.

Kate Carroll, Justine Adams, Katy de Valle, Robin Forbes, Rachel A Kennedy, Andrew J Kornberg, Moya Vandeleur, Daniella Villano, Ian R Woodcock, Eppie M Yiu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Muscle & nerve, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kate CarrollDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2519-3289
Justine AdamsDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Katy de ValleDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Robin ForbesNeuroscience Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Rachel A KennedyDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1805-6937
Andrew J KornbergDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Moya VandeleurDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Daniella VillanoDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Ian R WoodcockDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Eppie M YiuDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Monique M RyanDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Zoe DavidsonDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Royal Children's Hospital Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/

aimsIn response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic restrictions int 2020, our face-to-face (F2F) multidisciplinary neuromuscular clinic (NMC) transitioned to widespread use of telehealth (TH). This study aimed to (1) understand parent/guardian, child, and clinician perceptions of TH; (2) examine TH-related changes in clinical activity; and (3) use these findings to inform a future model of care for the NMC.

methodsA clinical audit was undertaken to examine clinical activity throughout 2018-2020. Online surveys were distributed to clinicians and parents of children attending the NMC via TH in 2020. A working group of clinicians created a checklist to guide a future hybrid model of TH and F2F care.

resultsTotal clinical activity in 2020 was maintained from previous years; 62.8% of all appointments occurred via TH, and 82.3% of patients attended NMC by TH at least once. Ninety-nine parents (30.6% response rate), 52 children, and 17 clinicians (77% response rate) responded to the survey. All groups reported better interaction when F2F compared to TH. Eighty percent of parents identified advantages of TH and reported lower levels of stress. A lack of "hands-on" physical assessment was identified by parents and clinicians as a TH limitation. Most families (68.1% of parents; 58.8% of children) and all clinicians indicated a preference for a mix of TH and F2F NMC appointments in the future. DISCUSSION: This study has informed a checklist to guide future TH use in a new hybrid model of care. Further investigation is required to assess health impacts of TH use in pediatric neuromuscular care.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChildHumansPandemicsCOVID-19multidisciplinaryneuromuscularpaediatrictelehealth

Identifiers

PMID35426158
PMCPMC9325549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.