[Differences in Billing Patterns Between GPs and Pediatricians Using Early Diagnostics in Children and Adolescents as an Example: Analysis of Nationwide Data from Statutory Health Insurance Physicians].

backgroundDespite a 13.1% increase in the number of pediatricians between 2011 - 2020, the capacity of pediatric care has largely stagnated. This is due to increasing flexibility in working hours and a declining willingness of doctors to establish practices. In addition, there is an imbalance in the distribution of pediatric medical care capacities. While metropolitan areas are often characterized by oversupply, there is an increasing shortage of pediatricians, especially in rural areas. As a result, general practitioners in rural areas are increasingly taking over part of pediatric care. We quantify this compensation effect using the example of examinations of general health and normal child development (U1-U9).

methodsBasis of the analysis was the Doctors' Fee Scale within the Statutory Health Insurance Scheme (Einheitlicher Bewertungsmaßstab, EBM) from 2015 (4th quarter). Nationwide data from the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KBV) for general practitioners and pediatricians from 2015 was evaluated. In the first step, the EBM was used to determine the potential overlap of services between the two groups of doctors. The actual compensation between the groups was quantified using general health and normal child development as an example.

resultsIn section 1.7.1 (early detection of diseases in children) of the EBM, there is a list of 16 options for services that can be billed (fee schedule positions, GOP) by general practitioners and pediatricians. This particularly includes child examinations U1 to U9. The analysis of the national data of the KBV for the early detection of diseases in children showed significant differences between rural and urban regions in the billing procedure. Nationwide, general practitioners billed 6.6% of the services in the area of early detection of diseases in children in 2015. In rural regions this share was 23% compared to 3.6% in urban regions. The analysis of the nationwide data showed that the proportion of services billed by general practitioners was higher in rural regions than in urban regions.

conclusionThe EBM allows billing of services by both general practitioners and pediatricians, especially in the area of general GOP across all medical groups. The national billing data of the KBV shows that general practitioners in rural regions bill more services from the corresponding sections than in urban regions.