Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35425830›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Assessment of Antimicrobial Effects on Broiler Gut Barrier Through Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry of Tight-Junction Proteins.

Matteo Cuccato, Frine Eleonora Scaglione, Cinzia Centelleghe, Sara Divari, Bartolomeo Biolatti, Paola Pregel, Francesca Tiziana Cannizzo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A NEW FOCUS ON FIBER.Poultry science · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matteo CuccatoDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Frine Eleonora ScaglioneDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Cinzia CentellegheDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Sara DivariDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Bartolomeo BiolattiDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Paola PregelDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Francesca Tiziana CannizzoDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, antimicrobial (AM) use in poultry farming has been attracting attention worldwide mainly due to AM resistance spreading. The role of AM prophylaxis in the modulation of gut microbiota, as well as of gut health, is still not clearly understood. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the role of different prophylaxis protocols in the modulation of the gut barrier in broilers by applying a histopathological approach. Intestinal tissue samples were collected from a total of 240 male broilers (Ross 306), reared and treated with different AM protocols. Haematoxylin and Eosin (HE) staining and a multiple scoring system were used to evaluate the presence of lesions in ileum, cecum and colon of treated broilers. Moreover, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to assess the expression of claudin-3 and ZO-1 proteins in intestinal tissues. The application of a semi-quantitative scoring system was used in IHC stained samples. HE results revealed that intestinal tissues were mainly characterized by epithelial detachment and fusion of the intestinal villi, but also by the presence of lymphocytic infiltrate in the mucosa and submucosa of AM-treated broilers. However, the IHC approach for the evaluation of claudin-3 and ZO-1 proteins showed that their expression was not affected by the different AM treatments. Nevertheless, the presence of intestinal lesions highlighted by histopathology suggests that AM treatments could harm the gut health of broilers, inducing an inflammatory response and consequent epithelial lesions. In order to clarify the role of AM treatments in the modulation of gut barrier in broilers, further studies are needed.

Indexed as

antimicrobialbroilercoccidiostatgut barrierintestinetight-junction

Identifiers

PMID35425830
PMCPMC9002056
OpenAlexW4220809660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.