Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35425751›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Investigating the Public Sentiment in Major Public Emergencies Through the Complex Networks Method: A Case Study of COVID-19 Epidemic.

Guang Yang, Zhidan Wang, Lin Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guang YangSchool of Education Science, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China.
Zhidan WangSchool of Education Science, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China.
Lin ChenSchool of Education Science, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to investigate what topic indicators correlate with public sentiment during "coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic" and which indicators control the complex networks of the topic indicators. We obtained 68,098 Weibo, categorized them into 11 topic indicators, and grouped these indicators into three dimensions. Then, we constructed the complex networks model of Weibo's topics and examined the key indicators affecting the public's sentiment during the major public emergency. The results showed that "positive emotion" is positively correlated with "recordings of epidemic" and "foreign comparisons," while "negative emotion" is negatively correlated with "government image," "recordings of epidemic," and "asking for help online." In addition, the two vertexes of "recordings of epidemic" and "foreign comparisons" are the most important "bridges" which connect the government and the public. The "recordings of epidemic" is the main connection "hub" between the government and the media. In other words, the "recordings of epidemic" is the central topic indicator that controls the entire topic network. In conclusion, the government should publish the advance of the events through official media on time and transparent way and create a platform where everyone can speak directly to the government for advice and assistance during a major public emergency in the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaAttitudeEmergenciesHumansSARS-CoV-2big datacomplex networksCOVID-19major public emergencypublic sentimentWeibo

Identifiers

PMID35425751
PMCPMC9002016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.