ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Machine Learning-Assisted Ensemble Analysis for the Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A review of natural compounds to regulate platelet aggregation: molecular mechanism and research advance.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- An MRI-based machine learning radiomics can predict short-term response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter study.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) vs. adjuvant chemotherapy after CCRT is debated. Non-response to platinum-based NACT is a major contributor to poor prognosis, but there is currently no reliable method for predicting the response to NACT (rNACT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). In this study we developed a machine learning (ML)-assisted model to accurately predict rNACT. We retrospectively analyzed data on 636 patients diagnosed with stage IB2 to IIA2 cervical cancer at our hospital between January 1, 2010 and December 1, 2020. Five ML-assisted models were developed from candidate clinical features using 2-step estimation methods. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), clinical impact curve, and decision curve analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness and clinical applicability of each model. A total of 30 candidate variables were ultimately included in the rNACT prediction model. The areas under the ROC curve of models constructed using the random forest classifier (RFC), support vector machine, eXtreme gradient boosting, artificial neural network, and decision tree ranged from 0.682 to 0.847. The RFC model had the highest predictive accuracy, which was achieved by incorporating inflammatory factors such as platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-albumin ratio, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio. These results demonstrate that the ML-based prediction model developed using the RFC can be used to identify LACC patients who are likely to respond to rNACT, which can guide treatment selection and improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.