Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35425656›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastric cancer2022

Scoring Model Based on Nodal Metastasis Prediction Suggesting an Alternative Treatment to Total Gastrectomy in Proximal Early Gastric Cancer.

Seol So, Jin Hee Noh, Ji Yong Ahn, In-Seob Lee, Jung Bok Lee, Hwoon-Yong Jung, Jeong-Hwan Yook, Byung-Sik Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastric cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seol SoDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8789-3451
Jin Hee NohDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6720-9528
Ji Yong AhnDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0030-3744
In-Seob LeeDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3099-0140
Jung Bok LeeClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1420-9484
Hwoon-Yong JungDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1281-5859
Jeong-Hwan YookDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7987-5808
Byung-Sik KimDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9579-9211
Ulsan College · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Total gastrectomy (TG) with lymph node (LN) dissection is recommended for early gastric cancer (EGC) but is not indicated for endoscopic resection (ER). We aimed to identify patients who could avoid TG by establishing a scoring system for predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) in proximal EGCs. Materials and Methods: Between January 2003 and December 2017, a total of 1,025 proximal EGC patients who underwent TG with LN dissection were enrolled. Patients who met the absolute ER criteria based on pathological examination were excluded. The pathological risk factors for LNM were determined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A scoring system for predicting LNM was developed and applied to the validation group. Results: Of the 1,025 cases, 100 (9.8%) showed positive LNM. Multivariate analysis confirmed the following independent risk factors for LNM: tumor size >2 cm, submucosal invasion, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and perineural invasion (PNI). A scoring system was created using the four aforementioned variables, and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves in both the training (0.85) and validation (0.84) groups indicated excellent discrimination. The probability of LNM in mucosal cancers without LVI or PNI, regardless of size, was <2.9%. Conclusions: Our scoring system involving four variables can predict the probability of LNM in proximal EGC and might be helpful in determining additional treatment plans after ER, functioning as a good indicator of the adequacy of treatments other than TG in high surgical risk patients.

Indexed as

Endoscopic submucosal dissectionGastrectomyLymph node metastasisStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35425656
PMCPMC8980596
OpenAlexW4224091850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.