ReviewJournal of gastric cancer2022
A Comprehensive and Comparative Review of Global Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines.
Review in Journal of gastric cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with gastric cancer.ESMO open · 2024Guideline
- Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Stomach Preservation Following Laparoscopic Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the Multicenter Randomized Phase III SENORITA Trial.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Trial
- Oral vitamin B₁₂ after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: mapping the evidence.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026Review
- Patient therapy outcome modeling in cancer organoids is improved by cancer-associated fibroblasts and organoid assembly convolution.Molecular oncology · 2026Article
- Computed tomography with carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in diagnosing lymph node metastasis of early gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review of gastrointestinal cancers: epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and therapeutic strategies.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
- Function-preserving surgery in gastric cancer: current evidence and implications for the West.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Coping flexibility and associated factors after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: A cross-sectional multisite study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Follow-Up and Strategies After Curative Surgical Resection for Gastric Cancer.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Review
- Nomogram models for predicting lymph node metastasis and prognosis in early gastric cancer 60 or older: a population-based cohort study.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Systematic benchmarking of large Language models in programmed cell death-oriented gastric cancer research: a comparative analysis of DeepSeek‑V3, DeepSeek‑R1, and Claude 3.5.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- The Current Evidence and Future Direction of Adjuvant Treatment for Gastric Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine.Cancer research and treatment · 2025Review
- Bright and Specific Targeting of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Orthotopic Mouse Models of Gastric Cancer with a Fluorescent Anti-CEA Antibody.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Targeting miR-103a-3p/IGFBP5 axis: a potential therapeutic strategy for gastric cancer progression.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- The Value of Primary Tumor Resection in Patients with Liver Metastases: A 10-Year Outcome.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Analysis of self-transcendence status and influencing factors in gastric cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a random forest model-based study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- The impact of illness perception on self-transcendence in gastric cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: the chain mediating effect of hope levels and coping styles.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- KLASS (Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study Group) trials: a 20-year great journey in advancing surgical clinical research for gastric cancer.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Review
- CST1 promoted gastric cancer development by activating the AKT pathway.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive and Comparative Review of Global Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines: 2024 Update.Journal of gastric cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Countries differ in their treatment expertise and research results regarding gastric cancer; hence, treatment guidelines are diverse based on evidence and medical situations. A comprehensive and comparative review of each country's guidelines is imperative to understand the similarities and differences among countries. We reviewed and compared five gastric cancer treatment guidelines in terms of endoscopic, surgical, perioperative, and palliative systemic treatment based on evidence levels and recommendation grades, as well as the postoperative follow-up strategies for each guideline. The Korean, Chinese, and European guidelines provided evidence and grading of the recommendations. The United States guidelines suggested categories for evidence and consensus. The Japanese guidelines suggested evidence and recommendations only for systemic treatment. The Korean and Japanese guidelines described endoscopic treatment, surgery, and lymphadenectomy in detail. The Chinese, United States, and European guidelines more intensively considered perioperative chemotherapy. In particular, the indications for chemotherapy and the regimens recommended by each guideline differed slightly. Considering their medical situations, each guideline had some diversity in terms of adopting evidence, which resulted in heterogeneous recommendations. This review will help medical personnel to comprehensively understand the diversity in gastric cancer treatment guidelines for each country in terms of evidence and recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.