Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35425639›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2022

How the morning-afternoon cloudiness asymmetry affects the energy-maximizing azimuth direction of fixed-tilt monofacial solar panels.

Péter Takács, Judit Slíz-Balogh, Ákos Horváth, Dániel Horváth, Imre M Jánosi, Gábor Horváth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Péter TakácsEnvironmental Optics Laboratory, Department of Biological Physics, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Pázmány sétány 1, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5668-0901
Judit Slíz-BaloghEnvironmental Optics Laboratory, Department of Biological Physics, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Pázmány sétány 1, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8883-1973
Ákos HorváthMeteorological Institute, Universität Hamburg, Bundesstrasse 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5860-2368
Dániel HorváthEnvironmental Optics Laboratory, Department of Biological Physics, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Pázmány sétány 1, Hungary.
Imre M JánosiMax Plack Institute für Physik Komplexer Systeme, Nöthnitzer Strasse 38, D-01187 Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3705-5748
Gábor HorváthEnvironmental Optics Laboratory, Department of Biological Physics, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Pázmány sétány 1, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-9008-2411
Eötvös Loránd University · HULudovika University of Public Service · HUUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Northern Hemisphere, south is the conventional azimuth direction of fixed-tilt monofacial solar panels, because this orientation may maximize the received light energy. How does the morning-afternoon cloudiness asymmetry affect the energy-maximizing azimuth direction of such solar panels? Prompted by this question, we calculated the total light energy received by a fixed-tilt monofacial solar panel in a whole year, using the celestial motion of the Sun and the direct and diffuse radiation measured hourly throughout the year in three North American (Boone County, Tennessee, Georgia) and European (Italy, Hungary, Sweden) regions. Here we show that, depending on the tilt angle and the local cloudiness conditions, the energy-maximizing ideal azimuth of a solar panel more or less turns eastward from south, if afternoons are cloudier than mornings in a yearly average. In certain cases, the turn of the ideal azimuth of such solar panels may be worth taking into consideration, even though the maximum energy gain is not larger than 5% for nearly vertical panels. Specifically, when solar panels are fixed on vertical walls or oblique roofs with non-ideal tilt, the deviation of the energy-maximizing azimuth from the south can be incorporated in the design of buildings.

Indexed as

cloudsfixed-tilt solar panelmonofacial photovoltaicssolar energy

Identifiers

PMID35425639
PMCPMC9006036
OpenAlexW4223924374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.