Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35425620›Full record

ArticleAnnals of occupational and environmental medicine2022

Workplace influenza vaccination in private hospital setting: a cost-benefit analysis.

Mohd Ab Hadi Tohiar, Safurah Jaafar, Azimatun Noor Aizuddin, Tan Kok Leong, Azrin Syahida Abdul Rahim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of occupational and environmental medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohd Ab Hadi TohiarDepartment of Community Medicine, Business of Administration Healthcare Management, School of Medicine, International Medical University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8801-4663
Safurah JaafarDepartment of Community Medicine, Business of Administration Healthcare Management, School of Medicine, International Medical University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6834-7885
Azimatun Noor AizuddinDepartment of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8050-4150
Tan Kok LeongDepartment of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, International Medical University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4104-5315
Azrin Syahida Abdul RahimDepartment of Community Medicine, Business of Administration Healthcare Management, School of Medicine, International Medical University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9999-4305
IMU University · MYKPJ Ampang Puteri Specialist Hospital · MYNational University of Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Influenza illness causes several disruptions to the workforce. The absenteeism that often ensues has economic implications for employers. This study aimed to estimate the cost-benefit of influenza vaccination in a healthcare setting from the employer's perspective. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted in a private hospital in 2018-2019 comparing voluntary vaccinated with non-vaccinated employees with influenza vaccine. The analyses were made based on self-reporting on absenteeism and presenteeism from Influenza-like illnesses (ILIs). The costs incurred, both direct and indirect costs, were included in the study. A cost-benefit analysis was performed by measuring the cost of the vaccination program. The costs of absenteeism and reduced productivity were calculated using 3 hypothesised levels of effectiveness in the following percentage of productivity of 30%, 50%, and 70%. The costs were also calculated based on four scenarios: with and without operating income and with and without replacement. The benefits of the influenza vaccination from the employer's perspective were analysed. The benefit to cost ratio was determined. Results: A total of four hundred and twenty-one respondents participated. The influenza vaccination rate was 63.0%. The rate of ILI of 38.1% was significantly lower among vaccinated. The ILI-related absenteeism reported was also significantly lower amongst vaccinated employees at 30% compared to 70% non-vaccinated. Employers could save up to USD 18.95 per vaccinated employee when only labour cost was included or 54.0% of cost savings. The cost-saving rose to USD 155.56 when the operating income per employee was also included. The benefit to cost ratio confirmed that the net cost-benefit gained from the vaccination was more than the net cost of vaccination. Conclusions: Influenza vaccination for working adults was cost-saving and cost-beneficial when translated into financial investments for the employer. A workplace vaccination demonstrates a significant cost-benefit strategy to be applied in any institutional setting.

Indexed as

AbsenteeismCost-benefitInfluenza-Like illnessInfluenza vaccinationWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID35425620
PMCPMC8980743
OpenAlexW4214924540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.