Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35424999›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2022

Comparative study of the elimination of copper, cadmium, and methylene blue from water by adsorption on the citrus

Wassim El Malti, Akram Hijazi, Zahraa Abou Khalil, Zahraa Yaghi, Mohamad Kazem Medlej, Mohamad Reda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact Assessment and Sustainable Remediation of Heavy Metal and Radioactive Contamination in Aquatic Systems: A Review.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the efficacy ofRSC advances · 2024
    Article
  5. UtilizingRSC advances · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fabrication of Ternary MoSMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wassim El MaltiCollege of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East Kuwait Wassim.elmalti@aum.edu.kw.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0212-3939
Akram HijaziResearch Platform for Environmental Science (PRASE), Doctoral School of Science and Technology Lebanon.
Zahraa Abou KhalilResearch Platform for Environmental Science (PRASE), Doctoral School of Science and Technology Lebanon.
Zahraa YaghiResearch Platform for Environmental Science (PRASE), Doctoral School of Science and Technology Lebanon.
Mohamad Kazem MedlejResearch Platform for Environmental Science (PRASE), Doctoral School of Science and Technology Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4801-9232
Mohamad RedaResearch Platform for Environmental Science (PRASE), Doctoral School of Science and Technology Lebanon.
American University of the Middle East · KW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accumulation of heavy metals and dyes in wastewater is a persistent environmental threat with serious hazards consequences affecting all living organisms. Their removal has become a challenging environmental requirement. Adsorption using agricultural waste is one of the cost-effective removal techniques in which the biomass can be valorized. In this study, two adsorbents were prepared and compared in removing copper, cadmium, and methylene blue from water: citrus

Identifiers

PMID35424999
PMCPMC8969800
OpenAlexW4223987130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.