Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35424703›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2022

Two-step formulation of magnetic nanoprobes for microRNA capture.

Iveta Vilímová, Igor Chourpa, Stéphanie David, Martin Soucé, Katel Hervé-Aubert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iveta VilímováEA6295 Nanomédicaments et Nanosondes, Université de Tours Tours France katel.herve@univ-tours.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3164-4207
Igor ChourpaEA6295 Nanomédicaments et Nanosondes, Université de Tours Tours France katel.herve@univ-tours.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2116-0735
Stéphanie DavidEA6295 Nanomédicaments et Nanosondes, Université de Tours Tours France katel.herve@univ-tours.fr.
Martin SoucéEA6295 Nanomédicaments et Nanosondes, Université de Tours Tours France katel.herve@univ-tours.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6627-9660
Katel Hervé-AubertEA6295 Nanomédicaments et Nanosondes, Université de Tours Tours France katel.herve@univ-tours.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3315-903X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRs) belong to a family of short non-coding endogenous RNAs. Their over-expression correlates with various pathologies: for instance, miRNA-155 (miR-155) is over-expressed upon the development of breast cancers. However, the detection of miRs as disease biomarkers suffers from insufficient sensitivity. In the present study, we propose a protocol for a rapid and efficient generation of magnetic nanoprobes able to capture miR-155, with the aim of increasing its concentration. As a nanoprobe precursor, we first synthesized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) coated with covalently attached polyethylene glycol carrying a free biotin terminus (PEG-bi). Using streptavidin-biotin interactions, the nanoprobes were formulated by functionalizing the surface of the nanoparticles with the miR sequence (CmiR) complementary to the target miR-155 (TmiR). The two-step formulation was optimized and validated using several analytical techniques, in particular with Size-Exclusion High Performance Liquid Chromatography (SE-HPLC). Finally, the proof of the nanoprobe affinity to TmiR was made by demonstrating the TmiR capture on model solutions, with the estimated ratio of 18 : 22 TmiR : CmiR per nanoprobe. The nanoprobes were confirmed to be stable after incubation in serum.

Identifiers

PMID35424703
PMCPMC8982131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.