Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35424562›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2022

Comments on "Removal of methylene blue dye using nano zerovalent iron, nanoclay and iron impregnated nanoclay - a comparative study" by M. M. Tarekegn, R. M. Balakrishnan, A. M. Hiruy and A. H. Dekebo,

Jean-Claude Bollinger, Hai Nguyen Tran, Eder C Lima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jean-Claude BollingerGroupement de Recherches Eau, Sol, Environnement, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Limoges 87060 Limoges France jean-claude.bollinger@unilim.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4059-5793
Hai Nguyen TranInstitute of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, Duy Tan University Ho Chi Minh City 70000 Vietnam trannguyenhai@duytan.edu.vn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8361-2616
Eder C LimaInstitute of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) 91501-970 Porto Alegre RS Brazil eder.lima@ufrgs.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8734-1208

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study mentioned in the title of this comment paper contains some calculations/results that disagree with some basic chemistry concepts. These misleading calculations include (i) both kinetic and isotherm modelling through linear equations, and (ii) calculating the thermodynamic parameters for the adsorption processes. Thus, we run through the correct way to make these calculations. In our opinion, it is very confusing to continue to disseminate erroneous methods as applied in the original paper.

Identifiers

PMID35424562
PMCPMC8982056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.