ArticleRSC advances2021
Numerical study on the effect of discrete catalytic layer arrangement on methane steam reforming performance.
Article in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The arrangement of catalytic layers inside the reactor is an important factor that affects the efficiency of methane steam reforming to produce hydrogen, and the traditional continuous catalytic layer structure is limited by the heat and mass transfer, resulting in unbalanced heat distribution inside the reactor and poor reaction performance. In order to improve the performance of methane reforming and balance the internal temperature of the reactor, different catalytic layers were designed based on 2D numerical simulation, and different numbers of discrete catalytic layers were modeled to compare the heat and mass transfer, methane conversion rate and hydrogen yield between the walls and inside the reactor. The results show that the increase in the number of catalyst gaps improves the temperature gradient inside the reactor, reduces the average cold point temperature difference inside the reactor by up to 7.2%, maintains a better thermal balance inside the reactor, improves the reaction rate inside the reactor, and the methane conversion rate and hydrogen yield after the reaction have been improved by 28.46% and 12.7% respectively.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.