Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35424223›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2021

Iron-based single-atom electrocatalysts: synthetic strategies and applications.

Qinglei Liu, Yongfei Wang, Zhizhi Hu, Zhiqiang Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unlocking COiScience · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qinglei LiuKey Laboratory for Functional Material School of Chemical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning 185 Qianshan Zhong Road Anshan 114044 P. R. China zzq@ustl.edu.cn wyf8307@ustl.edu.cn.
Yongfei WangKey Laboratory for Functional Material School of Chemical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning 185 Qianshan Zhong Road Anshan 114044 P. R. China zzq@ustl.edu.cn wyf8307@ustl.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3369-5518
Zhizhi HuKey Laboratory for Functional Material School of Chemical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning 185 Qianshan Zhong Road Anshan 114044 P. R. China zzq@ustl.edu.cn wyf8307@ustl.edu.cn.
Zhiqiang ZhangKey Laboratory for Functional Material School of Chemical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning 185 Qianshan Zhong Road Anshan 114044 P. R. China zzq@ustl.edu.cn wyf8307@ustl.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance and cost of electrocatalysts play an important role in the development and application prospects of energy conversion technology. Single-atom catalysts (SACs) have constituted a new frontier in the field of catalytic science in recent years. As a non-precious metal, iron (Fe)-SACs show great potential in the field of electrocatalysis, which is comparable to or even better than the performance of precious metal catalysts. However, a robust, generic synthetic strategy toward atomically dispersed Fe catalysts is still lacking, which is still a formidable challenge to maintain the dispersion of Fe atoms at high temperatures and to obtain high catalytic activity. In this review, the latest progress in the synthesis of Fe-SACs is introduced and summarized, and the electrochemical applications of Fe-SACs are further summarized and discussed. Herein, the relationship between the structural characteristics and performance of Fe-SACs is further introduced and discussed. Finally, the existing problems and development prospects of Fe-SACs are discussed.

Identifiers

PMID35424223
PMCPMC8694016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.