ArticleRSC advances2021
Fused sphere carbon monoliths with honeycomb-like porosity from cellulose nanofibers for oil and water separation.
Article in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbon monoliths with a unique hierarchical surface structure from carbonized cellulose nanofibers were synthesized in pursuit of developing carbon materials from sustainable natural resources. Through a 2-step hydrothermal - carbonization method, TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers were turned into carbon-rich hydrochar embedded with polystyrene latex as template for 80 nm-sized pores in a honeycomb pattern, while the triblock copolymer Pluronic F-127 was used for a dual purpose not reported before: (1) an interface between the cellulose nanofibers and polystyrene particles, as well as (2) act as a secondary template as ∼1 μm micelles that form hollow carbon spheres. The use of nanofibers allowed more contact between the carbon spheres to coalesce into a working monolith while optimizing the pore structure. Oil-water separation studies have shown that carbon monoliths have high adsorption capacity due to surface area and hydrophobicity. Testing against commercially available activated carbon pellets show greater performance due to highly-developed macropores.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.