ArticleRSC advances2021
Machine learning
Article in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence (xAI) for 5-HTMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Integration of machine learning in 3D-QSAR CoMSIA models for the identification of lipid antioxidant peptides.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Applications and Potential of In Silico Approaches for Psychedelic Chemistry.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence Technologies for COVID-19 De Novo Drug Design.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serotonergic psychedelics, substances exerting their effects primarily through the serotonin 2A receptor (5HT2AR), continue to comprise a substantial portion of reported new psychoactive substances (NPS). In this paper five quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for predicting the affinity of 5-HT2AR ligands have been developed. The resulting models, exploiting the accessibility of the QSAR equations, generate a useful tool for the investigation and identification of unclassified molecules. The models have been built using a set of 375 molecules using Forge software, and the quality was confirmed by statistical analysis, resulting in effective tools with respect to their predictive and descriptive capabilities. The best performing algorithm among the machine learning approaches and the classical field 3D-QSAR model were then combined to produce a consensus model and were exploited, together with a pharmacophorefilter, to explore the 5-HT2AR activity of 523 105 natural products, to classify a set of recently reported 5-HT2AR NPS and to design new potential active molecules. The findings of this study should facilitate the identification and classification of emerging 5-HT2AR ligands including NPS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.