Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35423776›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2021

Prediction of emulsification behaviour of pea and faba bean protein concentrates and isolates from structure-functionality analysis.

Fatemeh Keivaninahr, Pravin Gadkari, Khaled Zoroufchi Benis, Mehmet Tulbek, Supratim Ghosh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Peas (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Functional Performance of Plant Proteins.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Fatemeh KeivaninahrDepartment of Food and Bioproduct Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan 51 Campus Drive Saskatoon S7N 5A8 SK Canada supratim.ghosh@usask.ca.
Pravin GadkariDepartment of Food and Bioproduct Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan 51 Campus Drive Saskatoon S7N 5A8 SK Canada supratim.ghosh@usask.ca.
Khaled Zoroufchi BenisDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon SK Canada.
Mehmet TulbekAGT Foods Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada.
Supratim GhoshDepartment of Food and Bioproduct Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan 51 Campus Drive Saskatoon S7N 5A8 SK Canada supratim.ghosh@usask.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8538-600X
University of Saskatchewan · CATyson Foods (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of different extraction methods on the structure-functionality and emulsification behaviour of pea and faba bean protein isolates, and concentrates were studied at pH 7 and 2, and a regression model was developed to predict emulsion characteristics based on protein properties. The concentrates produced by air classification had lower protein content but higher solubility in water compared to the isolates produced by isoelectric precipitation. The protein secondary structure did not show a consistent difference; however, much higher intrinsic fluorescence was observed for the soluble compared to the insoluble fractions. Interfacial tension of all faba proteins was lower than pea, while there was no significant difference between the concentrates and isolates. The higher protein content of the isolates was found to improve their water holding capacity. Canola oil (40 wt%)-in-water coarse emulsions, prepared with 2 wt% proteins and 0.25 wt% xanthan gum showed smaller particle size at pH 7 than pH 2, while the zeta potential, viscosity and gel strength were higher at pH 7. Emulsions stabilized with concentrates were better or comparable to the isolates in terms of particle size, zeta potential, and microstructure. The regression model predicted that an increase in solubility, intrinsic fluorescence, water and oil holding capacities are more favourable to decrease emulsion particle size, while an increase in solubility, intrinsic fluorescence would lead to higher emulsion destabilization. A decrease in interfacial tension was more favourable to lower destabilization. Emulsion viscosity was more dependent on water holding capacity compared to any other factor. Such models could be extremely beneficial for the food industry to modulate processing for the development of desired pulse protein ingredients.

Identifiers

PMID35423776
PMCPMC8696636
OpenAlexW3147927022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.