ArticleRSC advances2020
Binding selectivity of inhibitors toward the first over the second bromodomain of BRD4: theoretical insights from free energy calculations and multiple short molecular dynamics simulations.
Article in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Minireview on BET Inhibitors: Beyond Bromodomain Targeting.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Binding selectivity-dependent molecular mechanism of inhibitors towards CDK2 and CDK6 investigated by multiple short molecular dynamics and free energy landscapes.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2023Article
- Deciphering Selectivity Mechanism of BRD9 and TAF1(2) toward Inhibitors Based on Multiple Short Molecular Dynamics Simulations and MM-GBSA Calculations.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Binding selectivity analysis of AURKs inhibitors through molecular dynamics simulation studies.PloS one · 2023Article
- A proteomics-MM/PBSA dual approach for the analysis of SARS-CoV-2 main protease substrate peptide specificity.Peptides · 2022Article
- Theoretical exploration of the binding selectivity of inhibitors to BRD7 and BRD9 with multiple short molecular dynamics simulations.RSC advances · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) plays an important role in mediating gene transcription involved in cancers and non-cancer diseases such as acute heart failure and inflammatory diseases. In this work, multiple short molecular dynamics (MSMD) simulations are integrated with a molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (MM-GBSA) approach to decipher binding selectivity of three inhibitors 8NS, 82Y, and 837 toward two domains BD1 and BD2 of BRD4. The results demonstrate that the enthalpy effects play critical roles in selectivity identification of inhibitors toward BD1 and BD2, determining that 8NS has better selectivity toward BD2 than BD1, while 82Y and 837 more favorably bind to BD1 than BD2. A residue-based free-energy decomposition method was used to calculate an inhibitor-residue interaction spectrum and unveil contributions of separate residues to binding selectivity. The results identify six common residues, containing (P82, P375), (V87, V380), (L92, L385), (L94, L387), (N140, N433), and (I146, V439) individually belonging to (BD1, BD2) of BRD4, and yield a considerable binding difference of inhibitors to BD1 and BD2, suggesting that these residues play key roles in binding selectivity of inhibitors toward BD1 and BD2 of BRD4. Therefore, these results provide useful dynamics information and a structure affinity relationship for the development of highly selective inhibitors targeting BD1 and BD2 of BRD4.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.