Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35423635›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2021

The influence of terpenes on the release of volatile organic compounds and active ingredients to cannabis vaping aerosols.

Jiries Meehan-Atrash, Wentai Luo, Kevin J McWhirter, David G Dennis, David Sarlah, Robert P Jensen, Isaac Afreh, Jia Jiang, Kelley C Barsanti, Alisha Ortiz and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring Aroma and Flavor Diversity inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Cannabis consumption conundrum: weighing the risks of vaping and smoking.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Cannabis concentrate vaping chemistry.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Novel ΔChemical research in toxicology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jiries Meehan-AtrashDepartment of Chemistry, Portland State University Portland Oregon 97207-0751 USA strongin@pdx.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8044-8547
Wentai LuoDepartment of Chemistry, Portland State University Portland Oregon 97207-0751 USA strongin@pdx.edu.
Kevin J McWhirterDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State University Portland Oregon 97207-0751 USA.
David G DennisRoger Adams Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois Urbana Illinois 61801 USA.
David SarlahRoger Adams Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois Urbana Illinois 61801 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8736-8953
Robert P JensenFlorascience Inc. Milwaukie OR 97222 USA.
Isaac AfrehChemical and Environmental Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, University of California-Riverside Riverside California 92521 USA.
Jia JiangChemical and Environmental Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, University of California-Riverside Riverside California 92521 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3261-0319
Kelley C BarsantiChemical and Environmental Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, University of California-Riverside Riverside California 92521 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-8643
Alisha OrtizDepartment of Chemistry, Portland State University Portland Oregon 97207-0751 USA strongin@pdx.edu.
Robert M StronginDepartment of Chemistry, Portland State University Portland Oregon 97207-0751 USA strongin@pdx.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3777-8492
Portland State University · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USProvidence Milwaukie Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dabbing and vaping cannabis extracts have gained large popularity in the United States as alternatives to cannabis smoking, but diversity in both available products and consumption habits make it difficult to assess consumer exposure to psychoactive ingredients and potentially harmful components. This work studies the how relative ratios of the two primary components of cannabis extracts, Δ

Identifiers

PMID35423635
PMCPMC8695911
OpenAlexW3135930295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.