ArticleRSC advances2021
The importance of nanofiber hydrophobicity for effective fog water collection.
Article in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomimetic engineering for water harvesting: 3D printed solutions for arid regions.RSC applied interfaces · 2026Article
- Article
- Bioinspired and Biomimetic Wetting Properties.ACS nano · 2025Review
- Environmentally Friendly and All-Dry Hydrophobic Patterning of Graphene Oxide for Fog Harvesting.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Photoresponsive Electrospun Fiber Meshes with Switchable Wettability for Effective Fog Water Harvesting in Variable Humidity Conditions.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023Article
- A strategy for preparing controllable, superhydrophobic, strongly sticky surfaces using SiORSC advances · 2021Article
- Surface Potential Driven Water Harvesting from Fog.ACS nano · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To increase fog collection efficiency in a fiber system, controlled wetting properties are desirable. In this work, hydrophobic (PA11) and hydrophilic (PA6) polyamides were tested to verify the surface wetting effect on fog water collection rate. Highly porous fiber meshes were obtained from both polymer solutions. Randomly oriented fibers with average diameter of approximately 150 nm were observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Despite the similar geometry and zeta potential of PA6 and PA11 meshes, it was shown that the hydrophobic PA11 nanofibers are more effective at water collection than hydrophilic PA6. These results indicate that wetting properties of electrospun nanofiber mesh have a significant effect on the process of draining from the mesh, as discussed in this paper. The results obtained are crucial for designing more efficient fog water collectors that include nanofibers in their construction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.