Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35423359›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2021

Development of a colorless

Suppalak Phaisan, Fonthip Makkliang, Waraporn Putalun, Seiichi Sakamoto, Gorawit Yusakul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sustainable Extraction ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Extraction of Bioactive Compounds FromInternational journal of food science · 2024
    Review
  9. Chitosan-Based Hydrogels for Controlled Delivery of Asiaticoside-RichInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suppalak PhaisanSchool of Pharmacy, Walailak University Thaiburi, Thasala Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160 Thailand gorawit.yu@mail.wu.ac.th.
Fonthip MakkliangSchool of Pharmacy, Walailak University Thaiburi, Thasala Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160 Thailand gorawit.yu@mail.wu.ac.th.
Waraporn PutalunFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University Khon Kaen 40002 Thailand.
Seiichi SakamotoDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University Fukuoka 812-8582 Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6871-522X
Gorawit YusakulSchool of Pharmacy, Walailak University Thaiburi, Thasala Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160 Thailand gorawit.yu@mail.wu.ac.th.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4575-4936

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study outlines a green process for

Identifiers

PMID35423359
PMCPMC8695212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.