Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35423337›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2021

Advantages, limitations, and future suggestions in studying graphene-based desalination membranes.

Stefania Castelletto, Alberto Boretti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. To Substitute Rather Than Intercalate:Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefania CastellettoRMIT University Melbourne Australia stefania.castelletto@rmit.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8675-2291
Alberto BorettiPrince Mohammad Bin Fahd University Al Khobar Saudi Arabia deanshipofresearch@pmu.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3374-0238
MIT University · MKPrince Mohammad bin Fahd University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential of novel 2D carbon materials such as nanoporous single-layer graphene and multilayer graphene oxide membranes is based on their possible advantages such as high water permeability, high selectivity capable of rejecting monovalent ions, with high salt rejection, reduced fouling, and high chemical and physical stability. Here we review how the field has advanced in the study of their performances in various desalination approaches such as reverse osmosis, forward osmosis, nanofiltration, membrane distillation, and solar water purification. The research on making high-performance graphene membranes which started with reverse osmosis applications is seemingly evolving towards other directions.

Identifiers

PMID35423337
PMCPMC8695175
OpenAlexW3129333781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.