ArticleRSC advances2021
Health and ecological risk assessment and simulation of heavy metal-contaminated soil of Tehran landfill.
Article in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human health risk and remedial goal assessment using Monte Carlo simulation: a case study of arsenic contaminated allotment gardens in southern Poland.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2026Article
- ICP-MS-Based Assessment of Heavy Metals in Green Tea Leaves from Gilan: Multi-Element Determination, Health Risk Evaluation, and Monte Carlo Uncertainty Analysis.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- Health Risk Assessment of Metal(loid)s in Black and Dark-Colored Sachet Hair Dyes Purchased from Online Retail Platforms in Thailand.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- Determinants of blood lead and cadmium levels in sanitary landfill workers: a cross-sectional study in Greece.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Health risk assessment and contamination of lead and cadmium levels in sediments of the northwestern Arabian Gulf coast.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- A comprehensive investigation of geoenvironmental pollution and health effects from municipal solid waste landfills.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2024Article
- Article
- The molecular insights of cyanobacterial bioremediations of heavy metals: the current and the future challenges.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Potentially toxic elements (PTEs) and ecological risk at waste disposal sites: An analysis of sanitary landfills.PloS one · 2024Article
- Pets, Genuine Tools of Environmental Pollutant Detection.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Statistical analysis of PRSC advances · 2022Article
- Association between heavy metals and metabolic syndrome in drinking water and surface soil: case-control study in Iran.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Source and Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Soil-Ginger System in the Jing River Basin of Shandong Province, North China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The toxic effects of heavy metals in landfill soils have become a significant concern for human health. The present study aimed to estimate the health and ecological risk associated with soil heavy metal in Tehran landfill. A total of 48 soil samples were taken from the landfill and residential area and were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy. The results showed the following order for heavy metal levels in landfill soil: Al > Fe > Mn > Zn > Cr > Cu > Pb > Ni > Co > As > Cd. The investigated ecological indices showed moderate to high heavy metal pollution. The principal component analysis revealed that the concentration of Pb, Cu, Zn, Cr, and Ni in the investigated soil was mainly affected by anthropogenic activities. Although the hazard index (HI) value in children was 6.5 times greater than that of adults, this value for both landfill workers and residents of the target area was at a safe level (HI ≤ 1). In the residential area, the Incremental Lifetime Cancer Risk (ILCR) value of adults (1.4 × 10
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.