Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35423213›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2021

A comprehensive review on antimicrobial face masks: an emerging weapon in fighting pandemics.

Gayathri Pullangott, Uthradevi Kannan, Gayathri S, Degala Venkata Kiran, Shihabudheen M Maliyekkal

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Passive antifouling and active self-disinfecting antiviral surfaces.Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gayathri PullangottDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati Andhra Pradesh 517619 India shihab@iittp.ac.in sm.maliyekkal@gmail.com +91 877 2503004 +91 877 2503164.
Uthradevi KannanDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati Andhra Pradesh 517619 India shihab@iittp.ac.in sm.maliyekkal@gmail.com +91 877 2503004 +91 877 2503164.
Gayathri SDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati Andhra Pradesh 517619 India shihab@iittp.ac.in sm.maliyekkal@gmail.com +91 877 2503004 +91 877 2503164.
Degala Venkata KiranDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati Andhra Pradesh 517619 India.
Shihabudheen M MaliyekkalDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati Andhra Pradesh 517619 India shihab@iittp.ac.in sm.maliyekkal@gmail.com +91 877 2503004 +91 877 2503164.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4478-9870
Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The world has witnessed several incidents of epidemics and pandemics since the beginning of human existence. The gruesome effects of microbial threats create considerable repercussions on the healthcare systems. The continually evolving nature of causative viruses due to mutation or re-assortment sometimes makes existing medicines and vaccines inactive. As a rapid response to such outbreaks, much emphasis has been placed on personal protective equipment (PPE), especially face mask, to prevent infectious diseases from airborne pathogens. Wearing face masks in public reduce disease transmission and creates a sense of community solidarity in collectively fighting the pandemic. However, excessive use of single-use polymer-based face masks can pose a significant challenge to the environment and is increasingly evident in the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. On the contrary, face masks with inherent antimicrobial properties can help in real-time deactivation of microorganisms enabling multiple-use and reduces secondary infections. Given the advantages, several efforts are made incorporating natural and synthetic antimicrobial agents (AMA) to produce face mask with enhanced safety, and the literature about such efforts are summarised. The review also discusses the literature concerning the current and future market potential and environmental impacts of face masks. Among the AMA tested, metal and metal-oxide based materials are more popular and relatively matured technology. However, the repeated use of such a face mask may pose a danger to the user and environment due to leaching/detachment of nanoparticles. So careful consideration is required to select AMA and their incorporation methods to reduce their leaching and environmental impacts. Also, systematic studies are required to establish short-term and long-term benefits.

Identifiers

PMID35423213
PMCPMC8694960
OpenAlexW3126563363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.