Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35422951›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2022

Efficacy and safety of pramipexole in Parkinson's disease with anxiety or depression: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Niu Ji, Pin Meng, Bingchao Xu, Xinyu Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Niu JiDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University Lianyungang 222000, Jiangsu, China.
Pin MengDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University Lianyungang 222000, Jiangsu, China.
Bingchao XuDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University Lianyungang 222000, Jiangsu, China.
Xinyu ZhouDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University Lianyungang 222000, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate the efficacy and safety of pramipexole in Parkinson's disease with anxiety or depression by analyzing the randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

methodsNational Library of Medicine (PubMed), Cochrane Library of EMBASE, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang database were retrieved to conduct a meta-analysis. We performed sensitivity analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of pramipexole in Parkinson's disease with anxiety or depression.

resultsIn our study, the results showed that the efficiency was significantly improved in patients with Parkinson's disease of the experimental group (fixed effect model, SMD = 3.45, 95% CI = [2.50, 4.76]). The HAMD score of experimental group was lower than that of control group. Moreover, adverse events of experimental group were lower than that of control group.

conclusionsThe research demonstrated that pramipexole may improve the efficacy and HAMD score of Parkinson's disease with anxiety or depression. Due to the limited number of included studies, more RCTs are needed to investigate the effect of pramipexole in Parkinson's disease with anxiety or depression.

Indexed as

anxietydepressionefficacymeta-analysisParkinson’s diseasePramipexoleRCTssafety

Identifiers

PMID35422951
PMCPMC8991111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.