ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Diagnostic value of fibrinogen combined with thromboelastogram in postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nomogram based on clinical characteristics and ultrasound indicators for predicting severe postpartum hemorrhage in patients with anterior placenta previa combined with previous cesarean section: a retrospective case-control study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- The predictive value of thromboelastography, routine blood indices, ultrasound parameters, and placental thickness in determining fetal outcome.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the diagnostic value of fibrinogen (Fib) combined with thromboelastogram (TEG) in postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) after vaginal delivery.
methodsA total of 120 women who underwent vaginal delivery in our hospital were divided into a PPH group (n=50) and a non-PPH group (n=70). The reaction time (R), clotting time (K), Fib, and D-dimer (D-D) levels were compared between the two groups. Patients in the PPH group were sub-divided into a mild hemorrhage group (n=28) and a severe hemorrhage group (n=22). The receiver operator characteristic curves of R, K, Fib, and D-D for predicting PPH were plotted respectively.
resultsThe levels of R, K, and D-D in the PPH group were significantly higher than those in the non-PPH group. The Fib level was significantly lower than that in the non-PPH group (
conclusionFib and TEG have good diagnostic values for PPH in women who underwent vaginal delivery, and can better predict PPH, providing evidence for clinical prevention and treatment of PPH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35422901PMC8991141W4226187792What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.