Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35422879›Full record

ArticleJournal of choice modelling2021

What factors influence HIV testing? Modeling preference heterogeneity using latent classes and class-independent random effects.

Jan Ostermann, Brian P Flaherty, Derek S Brown, Bernard Njau, Amy M Hobbie, Tara B Mtuy, Max Masnick, Axel C Mühlbacher, Nathan M Thielman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of choice modelling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jan OstermannDepartment of Health Services Policy & Management, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, USA.
Brian P FlahertyCenter for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Derek S BrownCenter for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Bernard NjauKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Amy M HobbieDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Tara B MtuyKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Max MasnickSelway Labs, LLC, Englewood, CO, USA.
Axel C MühlbacherCenter for Health Policy & Inequalities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Nathan M ThielmanDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGIA Doris TOMARAS · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
Does preference-based HIV testing increase uptake in high risk populations?R01MH106388 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI OSTERMANN, JAN, THIELMAN, NATHAN M · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Identify HIV Testing Preferences in TanzaniaR21MH096631 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI OSTERMANN, JAN, THIELMAN, NATHAN M · 2012 to 2013
$387k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106388NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH096631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efforts to eliminate the HIV epidemic will require increased HIV testing rates among high-risk populations. To inform the design of HIV testing interventions, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with six policy-relevant attributes of HIV testing options elicited the testing preferences of 300 female barworkers and 440 male Kilimanjaro mountain porters in northern Tanzania. Surveys were administered between September 2017 and July 2018. Participants were asked to complete 12 choice tasks, each involving first- and second-best choices from 3 testing options. DCE responses were analyzed using a random effects latent class logit (RELCL) model, in which the latent classes summarize common participant preference profiles, and the random effects capture additional individual-level preference heterogeneity with respect to three attribute domains: (a) privacy and confidentiality (testing venue, pre-test counseling, partner notification); (b) invasiveness and perceived accuracy (method for obtaining the sample for the HIV test); and (c) accessibility and value (testing availability, additional services provided). The Bayesian Information Criterion indicated the best model fit for a model with 8 preference classes, with class sizes ranging from 6% to 19% of participants. Substantial preference heterogeneity was observed, both between and within latent classes, with 12 of 16 attribute levels having positive and negative coefficients across classes, and all three random effects contributing significantly to participants' choices. The findings may help identify combinations of testing options that match the distribution of HIV testing preferences among high-risk populations; the methods may be used to systematically design heterogeneity-focused interventions using stated preference methods.

Indexed as

Discrete choice experimentHIV counseling and testingPreference heterogeneityRandom effects latent class logit (RELCL)Tanzania

Identifiers

PMID35422879
PMCPMC9007550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.