Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35422726›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Tutor's Role in WhatsApp Learning Groups: A Quali-Quantitative Methodological Approach.

Susanna Annese, Francesca Amenduni, Vito Candido, Katherine Francis McLay, Maria Beatrice Ligorio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susanna AnneseDepartment of Education, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Francesca AmenduniResearch and Development, Sfuvet Swiss Federal University for Vocational Education and Training, Lugano, Switzerland.
Vito CandidoResearch and Development, Sfuvet Swiss Federal University for Vocational Education and Training, Lugano, Switzerland.
Katherine Francis McLaySchool of Education, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Maria Beatrice LigorioDepartment of Education, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, digital tools, such as WhatsApp, have been increasingly deployed to support group interaction and collaboration in higher education contexts. To understand contemporary, digitally-mediated collaborative dynamics - including the role played by tutors and the situated nature of group development - robust and innovative methodologies are needed. In this paper, we illustrate how integrating qualitative methods with quantitative tools used in qualitative ways makes it possible to trace how tutors adapt their style to support group development, which in turn triggers student development in a circular and responsive process. To make visible this contemporary phenomenon, we combine thematic content analysis - a qualitative tool - with a quantitative method: Social Network Analysis. Drawing on data generated by two WhatsApp learning groups (six students and four academic tutors) in research exploring the collaborative construction of boundary objects in a master's level "E-learning Psychology" course, we suggest that our methodological approach has the potential to support interrogation of complex and dynamic digitally-mediated group interactions. Our results show the situational nature of an effective tutorship style through its complex adaptation to learners' maturity, digital tools, and learning goals.

Indexed as

higher educationquali-quantitative methodsocial network analysisthematic content analysistutoringWhatsApp groups

Identifiers

PMID35422726
PMCPMC9003016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.