Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35422607›Full record

Trial reportClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Aflibercept and Micropulse Laser (DAM Study).

Keyvan Koushan, Arshia Eshtiaghi, Pauline Fung, Alan R Berger, David R Chow

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03143192 (Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema With Aflibercept and Micropulse Laser), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03143192 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema With Aflibercept and Micropulse Laser

TypeinterventionalSponsorKeyvan KoushanRan2017 to 2019Enrolled31ConditionsDiabetic Macular EdemaArmsMicropulse Laser, Sham Laser
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Subthreshold micropulse laser combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Efficacy of anti-VEGF monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy with subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) in the management of diabetic macular oedema (DMO): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Current Treatments for Diabetic Macular Edema.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keyvan KoushanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Arshia EshtiaghiFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pauline FungToronto Retina Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alan R BergerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David R ChowDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the safety and efficacy of micropulse (MP) macular laser in combination with intravitreal aflibercept for the treatment of center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME). Methods: A single-blind prospective randomized controlled pilot trial was performed. In total, 30 eyes of 30 patients with CI-DME and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between, and including, 20/30 and 20/400 were enrolled. Enrolled eyes were randomized to 2 groups. Group 1 received intravitreal aflibercept injections (IVT-AFL) with sham laser. Group 2 received IVT-AFL with MP laser. Both groups were followed every 4 weeks for 48 weeks and retreatment was performed on Results: The average number of intravitreal injections at 48 weeks was similar between the groups (8.5±3.3 in Group 1 vs 7.9±3.6 in Group 2, p=0.61). After 48 weeks, both groups demonstrated an improvement in BCVA and CMT. However, the difference in improvement between the groups was not statistically significant (p=0.18 for BCVA and p=0.57 for CMT). Conclusion: Intravitreal injections of aflibercept led to improvements in BCVA and CMT at 24 and 48 weeks. Addition of MP laser to eyes in group 2 did not offer additional benefit in reducing treatment burden or improving CMT. Eyes that received MP laser showed a numerically greater improvement in BCVA, although this was not statistically significant. Clinicaltrialsgov Identifier: NCT03143192 March 8, 2017.

Indexed as

anti-VEGFdiabetic macular edemamicropulse laservisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID35422607
PMCPMC9005121
OpenAlexW4225471584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.