ArticleNature human behaviour2022
Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample.
Article in Nature human behaviour, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxytocin, but not vasopressin, decreases willingness to harm others by promoting moral emotions of guilt and shame.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Trial
- Unifying to Advance Understanding: Collaborative, Community-Driven and 'Open' Approaches for Better Science in Sport.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- The Effect of Moral Judgment on Bystander Cooperation Behavior: The Role of Personal Force.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Effect of Impartial Beneficence on Bystander Cooperation Behavior: The Roles of Social Perception and Impartial Beneficence Personality.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Adolescents Are More Utilitarian Than Adults in Group Moral Decision-Making.PsyCh journal · 2025Article
- The emergence of moral alignment within human groups is facilitated by interbrain synchrony.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Beyond Trolleyology: The CNI Model of Moral-Dilemma Responses.Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc · 2025Review
- Cross-cultural differences in resolving sacrificial dilemmas: choices made and how they relate to judgments of their social acceptability.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- The German translation of the Oxford utilitarianism scale: Validation and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the observations.PloS one · 2025Article
- Emotion-Driven Moral Evaluation: A Mechanistic Study Based on the Drift-Diffusion Model.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Language Nativeness Modulates Physiological Responses to Moral vs. Immoral Concepts in Chinese-English Bilinguals: Evidence from Event-Related Potential and Psychophysiological Measures.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Online Moral Conformity: how powerful is a Group of Strangers when influencing an Individual's Moral Judgments during a video meeting?Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2023Article
- The dual-process theory of moral judgment does not deny that people can make compromise judgments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Registered report: Social face evaluation: ethnicity-specific differences in the judgement of trustworthiness of faces and facial parts.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Breakdown of utilitarian moral judgement after basolateral amygdala damage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- The matching effect in persuasive communication about lockdown.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
270 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of moral judgements often centres on moral dilemmas in which options consistent with deontological perspectives (that is, emphasizing rules, individual rights and duties) are in conflict with options consistent with utilitarian judgements (that is, following the greater good based on consequences). Greene et al. (2009) showed that psychological and situational factors (for example, the intent of the agent or the presence of physical contact between the agent and the victim) can play an important role in moral dilemma judgements (for example, the trolley problem). Our knowledge is limited concerning both the universality of these effects outside the United States and the impact of culture on the situational and psychological factors affecting moral judgements. Thus, we empirically tested the universality of the effects of intent and personal force on moral dilemma judgements by replicating the experiments of Greene et al. in 45 countries from all inhabited continents. We found that personal force and its interaction with intention exert influence on moral judgements in the US and Western cultural clusters, replicating and expanding the original findings. Moreover, the personal force effect was present in all cultural clusters, suggesting it is culturally universal. The evidence for the cultural universality of the interaction effect was inconclusive in the Eastern and Southern cultural clusters (depending on exclusion criteria). We found no strong association between collectivism/individualism and moral dilemma judgements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35422529What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.