Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35422406›Full record

ArticleWomen and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives2023

The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study.

Lauri M M van den Berg, Marie-Clare Balaam, Rebecca Nowland, Gill Moncrieff, Anastasia Topalidou, Suzanne Thompson, Gill Thomson, Ank de Jonge, Soo Downe, ASPIRE-COVID19 Research Team

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Travel behaviour changes and risk perception during COVID-19: A case study of Malaysia.Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauri M M van den BergAmsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG/Amsterdam Public Health, The Netherlands. Electronic address: L.m.m.vandenberg@amsterdamumc.nl.
Marie-Clare BalaamSchool of Community Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, UK.
Rebecca NowlandSchool of Community Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, UK.
Gill MoncrieffSchool of Community Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, UK.
Anastasia TopalidouSchool of Community Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, UK.
Suzanne ThompsonAmsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG/Amsterdam Public Health, The Netherlands; Research Centre of Midwifery Science Maastricht, Zuyd University, The Netherlands.
Gill ThomsonSchool of Community Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, UK.
Ank de JongeAmsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG/Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, The Netherlands.
Soo DowneSchool of Community Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, UK.
ASPIRE-COVID19 Research Team
University of Central Lancashire · GBVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNHS EnglandThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe national health care response to coronavirus (COVID-19) has varied between countries. The United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) have comparable maternity and neonatal care systems, and experienced similar numbers of COVID-19 infections, but had different organisational responses to the pandemic. Understanding why and how similarities and differences occurred in these two contexts could inform optimal care in normal circumstances, and during future crises.

aimTo compare the UK and Dutch COVID-19 maternity and neonatal care responses in three key domains: choice of birthplace, companionship, and families in vulnerable situations.

methodA multi-method study, including documentary analysis of national organisation policy and guidance on COVID-19, and interviews with national and regional stakeholders.

findingsBoth countries had an infection control focus, with less emphasis on the impact of restrictions, especially for families in vulnerable situations. Differences included care providers' fear of contracting COVID-19; the extent to which community- and personalised care was embedded in the care system before the pandemic; and how far multidisciplinary collaboration and service-user involvement were prioritised.

conclusionWe recommend that countries should 1) make a systematic plan for crisis decision-making before a serious event occurs, and that this must include authentic service-user involvement, multidisciplinary collaboration, and protection of staff wellbeing 2) integrate women's and families' values into the maternity and neonatal care system, ensuring equitable inclusion of the most vulnerable and 3) strengthen community provision to ensure system wide resilience to future shocks from pandemics, or other unexpected large-scale events.

Indexed as

COVID-19Maternal Health ServicesObstetricsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornNetherlandsPregnancyUnited KingdomCOVID-19Infection ControlMaternal Health ServicesNetherlandsNewborn CarePolicy DriversUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID35422406
PMCPMC8979792
OpenAlexW4225789459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.