Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35422101›Full record

SynthesisProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2022

The promising role of new molecular biomarkers in prostate cancer: from coding and non-coding genes to artificial intelligence approaches.

Ana Paula Alarcón-Zendejas, Anna Scavuzzo, Miguel A Jiménez-Ríos, Rosa M Álvarez-Gómez, Rogelio Montiel-Manríquez, Clementina Castro-Hernández, Miguel A Jiménez-Dávila, Delia Pérez-Montiel, Rodrigo González-Barrios, Francisco Jiménez-Trejo and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Paula Alarcón-ZendejasUnidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM, Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan. C.P., 14080, CDMX, México.ORCID 0000-0002-4342-3818
Anna ScavuzzoDepartamento de Urología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan. C.P., 14080, CDMX, México.
Miguel A Jiménez-RíosDepartamento de Urología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan. C.P., 14080, CDMX, México.
Rosa M Álvarez-GómezClínica de Cáncer Hereditario, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan. C.P., 14080, CDMX, México.ORCID 0000-0002-5458-7201
Rogelio Montiel-ManríquezUnidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM, Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan. C.P., 14080, CDMX, México.
Clementina Castro-HernándezUnidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM, Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan. C.P., 14080, CDMX, México.ORCID 0000-0002-5641-3627
Miguel A Jiménez-DávilaDepartamento de Urología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan. C.P., 14080, CDMX, México.
Delia Pérez-MontielDepartamento de Patología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan. C.P., 14080, CDMX, México.
Rodrigo González-BarriosUnidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM, Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan. C.P., 14080, CDMX, México.
Francisco Jiménez-TrejoInstituto Nacional de Pediatría, Insurgentes Sur No. 3700-C. Coyoacán. C.P., 04530, CDMX, México.
Cristian Arriaga-CanonUnidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM, Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan. C.P., 14080, CDMX, México. carriagac@incan.edu.mx.ORCID 0000-0002-4866-9067
Luis A HerreraUnidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM, Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan. C.P., 14080, CDMX, México. lherrera@inmegen.gob.mx.ORCID 0000-0003-3998-9306
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXInstituto Nacional de Pediatria · MXNational Institute of Genomic Medicine · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRisk stratification or progression in prostate cancer is performed with the support of clinical-pathological data such as the sum of the Gleason score and serum levels PSA. For several decades, methods aimed at the early detection of prostate cancer have included the determination of PSA serum levels. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview about recent advances in the discovery of new molecular biomarkers through transcriptomics, genomics and artificial intelligence that are expected to improve clinical management of the prostate cancer patient.

methodsAn exhaustive search was conducted by Pubmed, Google Scholar and Connected Papers using keywords relating to the genetics, genomics and artificial intelligence in prostate cancer, it includes "biomarkers", "non-coding RNAs", "lncRNAs", "microRNAs", "repetitive sequence", "prognosis", "prediction", "whole-genome sequencing", "RNA-Seq", "transcriptome", "machine learning", and "deep learning".

resultsNew advances, including the search for changes in novel biomarkers such as mRNAs, microRNAs, lncRNAs, and repetitive sequences, are expected to contribute to an earlier and accurate diagnosis for each patient in the context of precision medicine, thus improving the prognosis and quality of life of patients. We analyze several aspects that are relevant for prostate cancer including its new molecular markers associated with diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction to therapy and how bioinformatic approaches such as machine learning and deep learning can contribute to clinic. Furthermore, we also include current techniques that will allow an earlier diagnosis, such as Spatial Transcriptomics, Exome Sequencing, and Whole-Genome Sequencing.

conclusionTranscriptomic and genomic analysis have contributed to generate knowledge in the field of prostate carcinogenesis, new information about coding and non-coding genes as biomarkers has emerged. Synergies created by the implementation of artificial intelligence to analyze and understand sequencing data have allowed the development of clinical strategies that facilitate decision-making and improve personalized management in prostate cancer.

Indexed as

MicroRNAsProstatic NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorHumansMaleProstate-Specific AntigenQuality of LifeBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID35422101
PMCPMC9385485
OpenAlexW4224005084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.