Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35422081›Full record

ArticleNature plants2022

Elevated extinction risk of cacti under climate change.

Michiel Pillet, Barbara Goettsch, Cory Merow, Brian Maitner, Xiao Feng, Patrick R Roehrdanz, Brian J Enquist

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature plants, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Phylogenetic networks empower biodiversity research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Phylogenomics and classification of Cactaceae based on hundreds of nuclear genes.Plant systematics and evolution = Entwicklungsgeschichte und Systematik der Pflanzen · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Climate mismatches with ectomycorrhizal fungi contribute to migration lag in North American tree range shifts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michiel PilletDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. mdpillet@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3215-8585
Barbara GoettschInternational Union for Conservation of Nature, Species Survival Commission, Cactus and Succulent Plants Specialist Group, Cambridge, UK.
Cory MerowEversource Energy Center and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Brian MaitnerEversource Energy Center and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Xiao FengDepartment of Geography, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Patrick R RoehrdanzMoore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4047-5011
Brian J EnquistDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6124-7096

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cactaceae (cacti), a New World plant family, is one of the most endangered groups of organisms on the planet. Conservation planning is uncertain as it is unclear whether climate and land-use change will positively or negatively impact global cactus diversity. On the one hand, a common perception is that future climates will be favourable to cacti as they have multiple adaptations and specialized physiologies and morphologies for increased heat and drought. On the other hand, the wide diversity of the more than 1,500 cactus species, many of which occur in more mesic and cooler ecosystems, questions the view that most cacti can tolerate warmer and drought conditions. Here we assess the hypothesis that cacti will benefit and expand in potential distribution in a warmer and more drought-prone world. We quantified exposure to climate change through range forecasts and associated diversity maps for 408 cactus species under three Representative Concentration Pathways (2.6, 4.5 and 8.5) for 2050 and 2070. Our analyses show that 60% of species will experience a reduction in favourable climate, with about a quarter of species exposed to environmental conditions outside of the current realized niche in over 25% of their current distribution. These results show low sensitivity to many uncertainties in forecasting, mostly deriving from dispersal ability and model complexity rather than climate scenarios. While current range size and the International Union for Conservation of Nature's Red List category were not statistically significant predictors of predicted future changes in suitable climate area, epiphytes had the greatest exposure to novel climates. Overall, the number of cactus species at risk is projected to increase sharply in the future, especially in current richness hotspots. Land-use change has previously been identified as the second-most-common driver of threat among cacti, affecting many of the ~31% of cacti that are currently threatened. Our results suggest that climate change will become a primary driver of cactus extinction risk with 60-90% of species assessed negatively impacted by climate change and/or other anthropogenic processes, depending on how these threat processes are distributed across cactus species.

Indexed as

CactaceaeClimate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesDroughtsEcosystem

Identifiers

PMID35422081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.