ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2022
Factors that influence scope of practice of the chiropractic profession in Australia: a scoping review.
Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chiropractic identity, role, and future: A secondary analysis of a survey of South African chiropractors.Journal of chiropractic humanities · 2025Article
- Cross-sectional analysis of online information on low back pain across South African chiropractic websites.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2025Article
- The utilization of the concept of profession to understand social problems: sharing preliminary results from systematic review.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Review
- Factors that influence the scope of practice of the chiropractic profession in Australia: a thematic analysis.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2024Article
- Uniting disciplines for a modern take: exploring the science behind manual therapies.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2024Article
- Factors that influence scope of practice of the five largest health care professions in Australia: a scoping review.Human resources for health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe World Health Organization describes chiropractic as a health profession that treats the musculoskeletal system and the effects of that system on the function of the nervous system and general health. Notwithstanding such descriptions, scope of practice remains a contentious issue in Australia chiropractic with various authors defining it differently. To date, the peak governing body, the Chiropractic Board of Australia, has focused on title protection rather than defining a scope of practice for the profession. A well-defined scope of practice is important, as it helps to identify what is acceptable in the profession and the role chiropractic has in the broader healthcare system.
objectiveThe objective of this scoping review was to explore the literature on the factors that influence scope of practice of chiropractic in Australia.
methodsThis study employed scoping review methodology to document the current state of the literature on factors that influence scope of practice of the chiropractic profession in Australia.
resultsA total of 1270 articles were identified from the literature search. Six studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Four factors that influence scope of practice were identified: education, professional identity, patient safety, and organisational structure.
conclusionThe results of this study will inform future discussions around establishing a framework for a more comprehensive scope of practice for the chiropractic profession in Australia. Such a framework has the potential to benefit patient safety, professional identity, public perception, education, and regulation of the profession.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.