Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35421996›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2022

Factors that influence scope of practice of the chiropractic profession in Australia: a scoping review.

Desmond Wiggins, Aron Downie, Roger Engel, Benjamin T Brown

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Desmond WigginsDepartment of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. desmond-charles.wiggins@hdr.mq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-2619-8049
Aron DownieDepartment of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Roger EngelDepartment of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Benjamin T BrownDepartment of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe World Health Organization describes chiropractic as a health profession that treats the musculoskeletal system and the effects of that system on the function of the nervous system and general health. Notwithstanding such descriptions, scope of practice remains a contentious issue in Australia chiropractic with various authors defining it differently. To date, the peak governing body, the Chiropractic Board of Australia, has focused on title protection rather than defining a scope of practice for the profession. A well-defined scope of practice is important, as it helps to identify what is acceptable in the profession and the role chiropractic has in the broader healthcare system.

objectiveThe objective of this scoping review was to explore the literature on the factors that influence scope of practice of chiropractic in Australia.

methodsThis study employed scoping review methodology to document the current state of the literature on factors that influence scope of practice of the chiropractic profession in Australia.

resultsA total of 1270 articles were identified from the literature search. Six studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Four factors that influence scope of practice were identified: education, professional identity, patient safety, and organisational structure.

conclusionThe results of this study will inform future discussions around establishing a framework for a more comprehensive scope of practice for the chiropractic profession in Australia. Such a framework has the potential to benefit patient safety, professional identity, public perception, education, and regulation of the profession.

Indexed as

ChiropracticManipulation, ChiropracticAustraliaHumansScope of PracticeAustraliaChiropracticScope of practiceScoping review

Identifiers

PMID35421996
PMCPMC9011944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.