Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35421978›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Ranked determinants of telemedicine diabetic retinopathy screening performance in the United States primary care safety-net setting: an exploratory CART analysis.

S Lee Ware, Christina R Studts, Feitong Lei, Heather Bush, Eric B Higgins, Jamie L Studts, Ana Bastos de Carvalho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Telemedicine Implementation for Safety Net Populations: A Systematic Review.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S Lee WareDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 110 Conn Terrace, Ste 550, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA.
Christina R StudtsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Feitong LeiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA.
Heather BushDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA.
Eric B HigginsDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 110 Conn Terrace, Ste 550, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA.
Jamie L StudtsCancer Prevention and Control Program, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, USA.
Ana Bastos de CarvalhoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 110 Conn Terrace, Ste 550, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA. aba253@uky.edu.
University of Kentucky · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
WU P&FP30DK020579 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Clay F. Semenkovich · 2013 to 2026
$27.1M
Cincinnati Eye Institute Foundation Ignite Award 2019NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001998NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020579NIH HHS P30DK020579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness worldwide, despite easy detection and effective treatment. Annual screening rates in the USA remain low, especially for the disadvantaged, which telemedicine-based DR screening (TDRS) during routine primary care has been shown to improve. Screening rates from such programs have varied, however, pointing to inconsistent implementation and unaddressed barriers. This work seeks to identify and prioritize modifiable barriers for targeted intervention.

methodsIn this final phase of an exploratory mixed-methods study, we developed, validated, and administered a 62-item survey to multilevel stakeholders involved with TDRS in primary care safety-net clinics. Survey items were aligned with previously identified determinants of clinic-level screening and mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analyses were used to identify and rank independent variables predictive of individual-level TDRS screening performance.

resultsOverall, 133 of the 341 invited professionals responded (39%), representing 20 safety-net clinics across 6 clinical systems. Respondents were predominately non-Hispanic White (77%), female (94%), and between 31 and 65 years of age (79%). Satisfaction with TDRS was high despite low self-reported screening rates. The most important screening determinants were: provider reinforcement of TDRS importance; explicit instructions by providers to staff; effective reminders; standing orders; high relative priority among routine diabetic measures; established TDRS workflows; performance feedback; effective TDRS champions; and leadership support.

conclusionsIn this survey of stakeholders involved with TDRS in safety-net clinics, screening was low despite high satisfaction with the intervention. The best predictors of screening performance mapped to the CFIR constructs Leadership Engagement, Compatibility, Goals & Feedback, Relative Priority, Champions, and Available Resources. These findings facilitate the prioritization of implementation strategies targeting determinants of TDRS performance, potentially increasing its public health impact.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyTelemedicineFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPrimary Health CareSafety-net ProvidersUnited StatesBarriers and facilitatorsClassification and regression tree (CART)Consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR)DeterminantsDiabetic retinopathyMixed methodsPrimary careScreeningTelemedicineUnderserved

Identifiers

PMID35421978
PMCPMC9011929
OpenAlexW4223938708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.