Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35421934›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Mistreatment during childbirth and postnatal period reported by women in Nepal -a multicentric prevalence study.

Rejina Gurung, Md Moinuddin, Avinash K Sunny, Amit Bhandari, Anna Axelin, Ashish Kc

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Rejina GurungResearch Division, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4262-3543
Md MoinuddinEdge Hill University Medical School, Ormskirk, UK.
Avinash K SunnyResearch Division, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Amit BhandariResearch Division, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Anna Axelin *Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2743-3589
Ashish Kc *Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. aaashis7@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0541-4486
Uppsala University · SENepal Development Research Institute · NPEdge Hill University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTrust of women and families toward health institutions has led to increased use of their services for childbirth. Whilst unpleasant experience of care during childbirth will halt this achievement and have adverse consequences. We examined the experience of women regarding the care received during childbirth in health institutions in Nepal.

methodA prospective cohort study conducted in 11 hospitals in Nepal for a period of 18 months. Using a semi-structured questionnaire based on the typology of mistreatment during childbirth, information on childbirth experience was gathered from women (n = 62,926) at the time of discharge. Using those variables, principal component analysis was conducted to create a single mistreatment index. Bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the association of the mistreatment index with sociodemographic, obstetric and newborn characteristics.

resultA total of 62,926 women were consented and enrolled in the study. Of those women, 84.3% had no opportunity to discuss any concerns, 80.4% were not adequately informed before providing care, and 1.5% of them were refused for care due to inability to pay. According to multivariate regression analysis, women 35 years or older (β, - 0.3587; p-value, 0.000) or 30-34 years old (β,- 0.38013; p-value, 0.000) were less likely to be mistreated compared to women aged 18 years or younger. Women from a relatively disadvantaged (Dalit) ethnic group were more likely to be mistreated (β, 0.29596; p-value, 0.000) compared to a relatively advantaged (Chettri) ethnic group. Newborns who were born preterm (β, - 0.05988; p-value, 0.000) were less likely to be mistreated than those born at term.

conclusionThe study reports high rate of some categories of mistreatment of women during childbirth. Women from disadvantaged ethnic group, young women, and term newborns are at higher risk of mistreatment. Strengthening health system and improving health workers' readiness and response will be key in experience respectful care during childbirth.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesQuality of Health CareAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornNepalParturitionPregnancyProspective StudiesDisadvantaged ethnic groupHealth system and NepalMistreatment during childbirthRespectful care at birth

Identifiers

PMID35421934
PMCPMC9011987
OpenAlexW4223897295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.