Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35421931›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2022

Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli, Enterobacter spp., Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterococcus spp. isolated from the feces of giant panda.

Xin Wang, Yi Zhang, Caiwu Li, Guo Li, Daifu Wu, Ti Li, Yuanyuan Qu, Wenwen Deng, Yongguo He, Petri Penttinen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xin Wang *College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yi Zhang *College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
Caiwu Li *Key Laboratory of SFGA on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, China Conservation and Research Center for Giant Panda, Dujiangyan, Sichuan, China.
Guo LiKey Laboratory of SFGA on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, China Conservation and Research Center for Giant Panda, Dujiangyan, Sichuan, China.
Daifu WuKey Laboratory of SFGA on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, China Conservation and Research Center for Giant Panda, Dujiangyan, Sichuan, China.
Ti LiKey Laboratory of SFGA on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, China Conservation and Research Center for Giant Panda, Dujiangyan, Sichuan, China.
Yuanyuan QuKey Laboratory of SFGA on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, China Conservation and Research Center for Giant Panda, Dujiangyan, Sichuan, China.
Wenwen DengCollege of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yongguo HeKey Laboratory of SFGA on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, China Conservation and Research Center for Giant Panda, Dujiangyan, Sichuan, China.
Petri PenttinenCollege of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Hemin ZhangKey Laboratory of SFGA on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, China Conservation and Research Center for Giant Panda, Dujiangyan, Sichuan, China.
Yan HuangKey Laboratory of SFGA on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, China Conservation and Research Center for Giant Panda, Dujiangyan, Sichuan, China.
Ke ZhaoCollege of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. zkfish@163.com.
Likou ZouCollege of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. zoulikou@sicau.edu.cn.
Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding · CNSichuan Agricultural University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEscherichia coli, Enterobacter spp., Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterococcus spp., common gut bacteria in giant pandas, include opportunistic pathogens. The giant panda is an endangered species, classified as vulnerable by the World Wildlife Foundation. Continuous monitoring for the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among bacterial isolates from giant pandas is vital not only for their protection but also for public health.

resultsA total of 166 E. coli, 68 Enterobacter spp., 116 K. pneumoniae and 117 Enterococcus spp. isolates were collected from fecal samples of 166 giant pandas. In the antimicrobial susceptibility tests, 144 E. coli isolates, 66 Enterobacter spp. isolates, 110 K. pneumoniae isolates and 43 Enterococcus spp. isolates were resistant to at least one antimicrobial. The resistant isolates carried antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), including sul3, bla

conclusionsAntimicrobial resistance was prevalent in the bacterial isolates from the giant pandas, implying that the gut bacteria may pose serious health risks for captive giant pandas. The resistance genes in the genome of K. pneumoniae K85 were associated with insertion sequences and integron-integrase genes, implying a potential for the further spread of the antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli InfectionsUrsidaeAnimalsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterobacterEnterococcusEscherichia coliFecesKlebsiella pneumoniaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesAntimicrobial resistanceGiant pandaResistance genesWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35421931
PMCPMC9008915
OpenAlexW4223894675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.