Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35421800›Full record

ReviewBiomaterials2022

Two-dimensional nanomaterials-added dynamism in 3D printing and bioprinting of biomedical platforms: Unique opportunities and challenges.

Bipin Gaihre, Maria Astudillo Potes, Vitalii Serdiuk, Maryam Tilton, Xifeng Liu, Lichun Lu

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Potential Biomedical Limitations of Graphene Nanomaterials.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bipin GaihreDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States.
Maria Astudillo PotesDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States.
Vitalii SerdiukDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States.
Maryam TiltonDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States.
Xifeng LiuDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States.
Lichun LuDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States. Electronic address: Lu.Lichun@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Musculoskeletal Research Training ProgramT32AR056950 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Jennifer J Westendorf · 2009 to 2026
$7.0M
Injectable and Moldable Composite Bone Scaffolds for Spinal FusionR01AR075037 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ELDER, BENJAMIN D, LU, LICHUN · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR075037NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR056950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nanomaterials research spectrum has seen the continuous emergence of two-dimensional (2D) materials over the years. These highly anisotropic and ultrathin materials have found special attention in developing biomedical platforms for therapeutic applications, biosensing, drug delivery, and regenerative medicine. Three-dimensional (3D) printing and bioprinting technologies have emerged as promising tools in medical applications. The convergence of 2D nanomaterials with 3D printing has extended the application dynamics of available biomaterials to 3D printable inks and bioinks. Furthermore, the unique properties of 2D nanomaterials have imparted multifunctionalities to 3D printed constructs applicable to several biomedical applications. 2D nanomaterials such as graphene and its derivatives have long been the interest of researchers working in this area. Beyond graphene, a range of emerging 2D nanomaterials, such as layered silicates, black phosphorus, transition metal dichalcogenides, transition metal oxides, hexagonal boron nitride, and MXenes, are being explored for the multitude of biomedical applications. Better understandings on both the local and systemic toxicity of these materials have also emerged over the years. This review focuses on state-of-art 3D fabrication and biofabrication of biomedical platforms facilitated by 2D nanomaterials, with the comprehensive summary of studies focusing on the toxicity of these materials. We highlight the dynamism added by 2D nanomaterials in the printing process and the functionality of printed constructs.

Indexed as

BioprintingGraphiteNanostructuresOxidesPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsGraphiteOxides2D nanomaterials3D bioprinting3D printingTherapeutic platformsTissue engineeringToxicity

Identifiers

PMID35421800
PMCPMC9933950
OpenAlexW4223916231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.