Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35421595›Full record

ReviewThe journal of pain2022

A Review of Potential National Chronic Pain Surveillance Systems in the United States.

Lindsey M Duca, Charles G Helmick, Kamil E Barbour, Richard L Nahin, Michael Von Korff, Louise B Murphy, Kristina Theis, Dana Guglielmo, James Dahlhamer, Linda Porter and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of pain, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lindsey M DucaDivision of Population Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: pgz5@cdc.gov.
Charles G HelmickDivision of Population Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kamil E BarbourDivision of Population Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Richard L NahinNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Michael Von KorffKaiser Permanente Washington, Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Louise B MurphyDivision of Population Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kristina TheisDivision of Population Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Dana GuglielmoDivision of Population Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
James DahlhamerNational Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland.
Linda PorterNational Institutes of Health, Director of the Office of Pain Policy, Bethesda, Maryland.
Titilola FalasinnuDepartments of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Sean MackeyDepartments of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.

Funding

Characterization of Chronic Pain and its Biopsychosocial Mechanisms in Lupus using Electronic Health RecordsK01AR079039 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FALASINNU, TITILOLA · 2021 to 2025
$631k
NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR079039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain has been established as a major public health problem in the United States (U.S.) with 50 million adults experiencing chronic pain and 20 million afflicted with high-impact chronic pain (ie, chronic pain that interferes with life or work activities). High financial and social costs are associated with chronic pain. Over the past 2 decades, pain management has been complicated by the marked increase in opioids prescribed to treat chronic noncancer pain and by the concurrent opioid crisis. Monitoring the prevalence of chronic pain and pain management is especially important because pain management is changing in uncertain ways. We review potential U.S. chronic pain surveillance systems, present potential difficulties of chronic pain surveillance, and explore how to address chronic pain surveillance in the current opioid era. We consider case definitions, severity, anatomic site, and varieties of chronic pain management strategies in reviewing and evaluating national surveys for chronic pain surveillance. Based on the criteria evaluated, the National Health Interview Survey offers the best single source for pain surveillance as the pain-related questions administered are brief, valid, and cover a broad scope of pain-related phenomena. PERSPECTIVE: This review article describes data sources that can be leveraged to conduct national chronic pain surveillance in the United States, explores case defining or pain-related questions administered, and evaluates them against 8 surveillance attributes.

Indexed as

Chronic PainAdultAnalgesics, OpioidCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansPain ManagementPrevalenceUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidChronic painhigh-impact chronic painpain managementpublic healthsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID35421595
PMCPMC9464678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.