Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35421450›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology2022

Generalization of reappraisal to novel negative stimuli as evidenced by the LPP.

Faviana Bautista, Shannon E MacDonald, Elizabeth A Bauer, Yuhan Cheng, Annmarie MacNamara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The late positive potential during affective picture processing: Associations with daily life emotional functioning among adolescents with anxiety disorders.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Successful emotion regulationFrontiers in human neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Faviana BautistaDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Shannon E MacDonaldDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Elizabeth A BauerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Yuhan ChengDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Annmarie MacNamaraDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America. Electronic address: amacnamara@tamu.edu.

Funding

HARM-A: A neurobiological predictor of comorbidity and stress reactivity in anxiety disordersR01MH125083 · NIMH · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI MACNAMARA, ANNMARIE EILEEN · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive reappraisal is a well-studied emotion regulation technique that involves changing the meaning of stimuli. To be useful in everyday life, reappraisal's effects would ideally generalize from previously reappraised stimuli to novel, but similar stimuli, saving individuals from needing to generate novel interpretations for similar stimuli. Here, 41 participants were asked to use reappraisal to down-regulate their response to negative pictures from one category (e.g., snakes), and to view negative pictures from another category (e.g., guns) as well as neutral pictures (e.g., plants). In a subsequent task, participants passively viewed novel pictures from all three categories (e.g., snakes, guns, and plants). EEG and subjective ratings of valence and arousal were collected in both tasks. In the reappraisal task, we did not find an effect of reappraisal on the LPP or arousal ratings, but reappraisal reduced ratings of picture unpleasantness. In the second task, negative pictures from the previously reappraised category elicited smaller LPPs than negative pictures from the previously viewed category, though there was no evidence that reappraisal generalized to subjective ratings of pictures. Therefore, at the electrocortical level, cognitive reappraisal may generalize to similar but novel stimuli encountered outside of the reappraisal context. Moreover, meaning change might be more effective in modulating electrocortical response following a delay and in the absence of deliberate attempts to down-regulate emotional response. Nonetheless, reappraisal's effects appear to differ across levels of affective response when similar stimuli are encountered in the absence of willful attempts at reappraisal.

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationEvoked PotentialsArousalElectroencephalographyEmotionsHumansCognitive reappraisalEmotion regulationEvent-related potential (ERP)GeneralizationLate positive potential (LPP)Time

Identifiers

PMID35421450
PMCPMC10851709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.