Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35421389›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2022

Coarse-grained modeling reveals the impact of supercoiling and loop length in DNA looping kinetics.

Charles H Starr, Zev Bryant, Andrew J Spakowitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Chromatinization Modulates Topoisomerase II Processivity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charles H StarrBiophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Zev BryantBiophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Andrew J SpakowitzBiophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California. Electronic address: ajspakow@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Structural Dynamics and Mechanochemical Coupling in Nucleoprotein MachinesR01GM106159 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Zev Bryant · 2014 to 2026
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurements of protein-mediated DNA looping reveal that in vivo conditions favor the formation of loops shorter than those that occur in vitro, yet the precise physical mechanisms underlying this shift remain unclear. To understand the extent to which in vivo supercoiling may explain these shifts, we develop a theoretical model based on coarse-grained molecular simulation and analytical transition state theory, enabling us to map out looping energetics and kinetics as a function of two key biophysical parameters: superhelical density and loop length. We show that loops on the scale of a persistence length respond to supercoiling over a much wider range of superhelical densities and to a larger extent than longer loops. This effect arises from a tendency for loops to be centered on the plectonemic end region, which bends progressively more tightly with superhelical density. This trend reveals a mechanism by which supercoiling favors shorter loop lengths. In addition, our model predicts a complex kinetic response to supercoiling for a given loop length, governed by a competition between an enhanced rate of looping due to torsional buckling and a reduction in looping rate due to chain straightening as the plectoneme tightens at higher superhelical densities. Together, these effects lead to a flattening of the kinetic response to supercoiling within the physiological range for all but the shortest loops. Using experimental estimates for in vivo superhelical densities, we discuss our model's ability to explain available looping data, highlighting both the importance of supercoiling as a regulatory force in genetics and the additional complexities of looping phenomena in vivo.

Indexed as

DNA, SuperhelicalComputer SimulationKineticsNucleic Acid ConformationDNA, Superhelical

Identifiers

PMID35421389
PMCPMC9199097
OpenAlexW4223411922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.